Park Soo-hong ⁇ Brother, ⁇ Kim Da-ye Announcer is qualified to contract.

on
Park Soo-hong attended the fifth hearing of Brother Couples alleged seizure and continued to testify about what he knew.On the afternoon of the 19th, the 11th criminal department of the western Seoul District Court proceeded with the fifth trial against Park Soo-hongs Brother Couple, who was indicted for violating the Seizure Law on Severe Economic Crime.The previous day, Park Soo-hongs The Attorney filed a non-disclosure trial, but the court did not accept it.On the grounds that the court did not allow a non-disclosure trial, the Defendants attorney filed a dissenting opinion, stating that the non-disclosure trial was exceptional and that the reason for the non-disclosure in the hearing should be strictly interpreted.It is a general property trial, so it is not an undisclosed trial, so it is difficult to be recognized as an exceptional case to keep the hearing private.However, the court asked the Defendants The Attorney to refrain from questioning witnesses or questions related to privacy, regardless of the crime, and to limit the questioning.On the day of the trial, Park Soo-hong and Defendant, The Attorney,Defendant The Attorney asked Park Soo-hong whether he would use housekeeping, and Park Soo-hong was sick of his parents suffering.I do not know why, but he insisted that he come home and clean it. Defendant I asked Mr. Park to stop his parents, stop him, but he fought, the house was upset, and his mother was completely out of food.So I knew that I had to suffer, but I came. So the Defendant asked if it was right that he did not use the helper, and Park Soo-hong wondered what the intention was to testify.Therefore, the court did not have to ask Park Soo-hong to find out the intention and ask The Attorney.The Defendant then submits the broadcast screen of the ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ as evidence, and the safe is visible in the corresponding part. It is confirmed that it is a large safe.Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before. Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before.Defendant said, If my father brought cash, I would not have put it in this safe, Park Soo-hong said.The Defendant, The Attorney, said in 2015 that the Father submitted a letter to the Defendant as evidence, saying that he had put money on the safe, and Park Soo-hong did not know how much money he had left, He said, Do you claim that I have received 30 million won?In Park Soo-hongs rebuttal, Defendant released another message and mentioned that ⁇ Father would put 24.5 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong said, If you have such a big money, I have made a lot of money by selling my car.Defendant gave it to me once. I replied, I do not have such a big money Memory.Defendant replied that Jessie had another message and ⁇ Defendant put 24.2 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong replied, Thank you!Park Soo-hong asked if there was a Memory that received this money, and Park Soo-hong asked if the money was not the money. Defendants lawyer said, Its May. The text is July.I asked him if he had ever received this money.Park Soo-hong answered that he did not have a memory frankly, and this situation continued several times.Park Soo-hong asked if the Attorney is Memorizing the Katok that he shared in 2015.Defendant then claimed that the amount was used as a tax on Park Soo-hong, not seizure, in connection with some of the charges against Jessie in the public hearing, and Park Soo-hong, who saw the evidence, questioned several times.It was pointed out that the court had seizure of 20 million won at that time, but the amount was paid by Park Soo-hongs tax on that day.The Attorney explained that this is not a seizure, so Park Soo-hong agrees and says that it is right to exclude that part.At the trial, the contents related to his wife Kim Da-ye were also mentioned.Defendant The Attorney said he had received 67.69 million won from the ⁇ Lael corporate account to Kim Da-yes account on November 27, 2019, and asked why the amount was transferred to his wifes Passbook.Park Soo-hong said, The amount was a management down payment.Defendant said Kim Da-ye had the qualities of an announcer and sent a contract by e-mail, but the contract was not fulfilled, so the tax was damaged and the down payment was returned.DB
Park Soo-hong attended the fifth hearing of Brother Couples alleged seizure and continued to testify about what he knew.On the afternoon of the 19th, the 11th criminal department of the western Seoul District Court proceeded with the fifth trial against Park Soo-hongs Brother Couple, who was indicted for violating the Seizure Law on Severe Economic Crime.The previous day, Park Soo-hongs The Attorney filed a non-disclosure trial, but the court did not accept it.On the grounds that the court did not allow a non-disclosure trial, the Defendants attorney filed a dissenting opinion, stating that the non-disclosure trial was exceptional and that the reason for the non-disclosure in the hearing should be strictly interpreted.It is a general property trial, so it is not an undisclosed trial, so it is difficult to be recognized as an exceptional case to keep the hearing private.However, the court asked the Defendants The Attorney to refrain from questioning witnesses or questions related to privacy, regardless of the crime, and to limit the questioning.On the day of the trial, Park Soo-hong and Defendant, The Attorney,Defendant The Attorney asked Park Soo-hong whether he would use housekeeping, and Park Soo-hong was sick of his parents suffering.I do not know why, but he insisted that he come home and clean it. Defendant I asked Mr. Park to stop his parents, stop him, but he fought, the house was upset, and his mother was completely out of food.So I knew that I had to suffer, but I came. So the Defendant asked if it was right that he did not use the helper, and Park Soo-hong wondered what the intention was to testify.Therefore, the court did not have to ask Park Soo-hong to find out the intention and ask The Attorney.The Defendant then submits the broadcast screen of the ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ as evidence, and the safe is visible in the corresponding part. It is confirmed that it is a large safe.Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before. Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before.Defendant said, If my father brought cash, I would not have put it in this safe, Park Soo-hong said.The Defendant, The Attorney, said in 2015 that the Father submitted a letter to the Defendant as evidence, saying that he had put money on the safe, and Park Soo-hong did not know how much money he had left, He said, Do you claim that I have received 30 million won?In Park Soo-hongs rebuttal, Defendant released another message and mentioned that ⁇ Father would put 24.5 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong said, If you have such a big money, I have made a lot of money by selling my car.Defendant gave it to me once. I replied, I do not have such a big money Memory.Defendant replied that Jessie had another message and ⁇ Defendant put 24.2 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong replied, Thank you!Park Soo-hong asked if there was a Memory that received this money, and Park Soo-hong asked if the money was not the money. Defendants lawyer said, Its May. The text is July.I asked him if he had ever received this money.Park Soo-hong answered that he did not have a memory frankly, and this situation continued several times.Park Soo-hong asked if the Attorney is Memorizing the Katok that he shared in 2015.Defendant then claimed that the amount was used as a tax on Park Soo-hong, not seizure, in connection with some of the charges against Jessie in the public hearing, and Park Soo-hong, who saw the evidence, questioned several times.It was pointed out that the court had seizure of 20 million won at that time, but the amount was paid by Park Soo-hongs tax on that day.The Attorney explained that this is not a seizure, so Park Soo-hong agrees and says that it is right to exclude that part.At the trial, the contents related to his wife Kim Da-ye were also mentioned.Defendant The Attorney said he had received 67.69 million won from the ⁇ Lael corporate account to Kim Da-yes account on November 27, 2019, and asked why the amount was transferred to his wifes Passbook.Park Soo-hong said, The amount was a management down payment.Defendant said Kim Da-ye had the qualities of an announcer and sent a contract by e-mail, but the contract was not fulfilled, so the tax was damaged and the down payment was returned.DB
Park Soo-hong attended the fifth hearing of Brother Couples alleged seizure and continued to testify about what he knew.On the afternoon of the 19th, the 11th criminal department of the western Seoul District Court proceeded with the fifth trial against Park Soo-hongs Brother Couple, who was indicted for violating the Seizure Law on Severe Economic Crime.The previous day, Park Soo-hongs The Attorney filed a non-disclosure trial, but the court did not accept it.On the grounds that the court did not allow a non-disclosure trial, the Defendants attorney filed a dissenting opinion, stating that the non-disclosure trial was exceptional and that the reason for the non-disclosure in the hearing should be strictly interpreted.It is a general property trial, so it is not an undisclosed trial, so it is difficult to be recognized as an exceptional case to keep the hearing private.However, the court asked the Defendants The Attorney to refrain from questioning witnesses or questions related to privacy, regardless of the crime, and to limit the questioning.On the day of the trial, Park Soo-hong and Defendant, The Attorney,Defendant The Attorney asked Park Soo-hong whether he would use housekeeping, and Park Soo-hong was sick of his parents suffering.I do not know why, but he insisted that he come home and clean it. Defendant I asked Mr. Park to stop his parents, stop him, but he fought, the house was upset, and his mother was completely out of food.So I knew that I had to suffer, but I came. So the Defendant asked if it was right that he did not use the helper, and Park Soo-hong wondered what the intention was to testify.Therefore, the court did not have to ask Park Soo-hong to find out the intention and ask The Attorney.The Defendant then submits the broadcast screen of the ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ as evidence, and the safe is visible in the corresponding part. It is confirmed that it is a large safe.Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before. Park Soo-hong replied, I did not know there was a safe before.Defendant said, If my father brought cash, I would not have put it in this safe, Park Soo-hong said.The Defendant, The Attorney, said in 2015 that the Father submitted a letter to the Defendant as evidence, saying that he had put money on the safe, and Park Soo-hong did not know how much money he had left, He said, Do you claim that I have received 30 million won?In Park Soo-hongs rebuttal, Defendant released another message and mentioned that ⁇ Father would put 24.5 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong said, If you have such a big money, I have made a lot of money by selling my car.Defendant gave it to me once. I replied, I do not have such a big money Memory.Defendant replied that Jessie had another message and ⁇ Defendant put 24.2 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong replied, Thank you!Park Soo-hong asked if there was a Memory that received this money, and Park Soo-hong asked if the money was not the money. Defendants lawyer said, Its May. The text is July.I asked him if he had ever received this money.Park Soo-hong answered that he did not have a memory frankly, and this situation continued several times.Park Soo-hong asked if the Attorney is Memorizing the Katok that he shared in 2015.Defendant then claimed that the amount was used as a tax on Park Soo-hong, not seizure, in connection with some of the charges against Jessie in the public hearing, and Park Soo-hong, who saw the evidence, questioned several times.It was pointed out that the court had seizure of 20 million won at that time, but the amount was paid by Park Soo-hongs tax on that day.The Attorney explained that this is not a seizure, so Park Soo-hong agrees and says that it is right to exclude that part.At the trial, the contents related to his wife Kim Da-ye were also mentioned.Defendant The Attorney said he had received 67.69 million won from the ⁇ Lael corporate account to Kim Da-yes account on November 27, 2019, and asked why the amount was transferred to his wifes Passbook.Park Soo-hong said, The amount was a management down payment.Defendant said Kim Da-ye had the qualities of an announcer and sent a contract by e-mail, but the contract was not fulfilled, so the tax was damaged and the down payment was returned.DB

Park Soo-hong attended the fifth hearing of Brother Couple's alleged seizure and continued to testify about what he knew. On the afternoon of the 19th, the 11th criminal department of the western Seoul District Court proceeded with the fifth trial against Park Soo-hong's Brother Couple, who was indicted for violating the seizure Law on Severe Economic Crime. The previous day, Park Soo-hong's The Attorney filed a non-disclosure trial, but the court did not accept it. On the grounds that the court did not allow a non-disclosure trial, the Defendant's attorney filed a dissenting opinion, stating that the non-disclosure trial was exceptional and that the reason for the non-disclosure in the hearing should be strictly interpreted. It is a general property trial, so it is not an undisclosed trial, so it is difficult to be recognized as an exceptional case to keep the hearing private. However, the court asked the Defendant's The Attorney to refrain from questioning witnesses or questions related to privacy, regardless of the crime, and to limit the questioning. On the day of the trial, Park Soo-hong and Defendant, The Attorney, Defendant The Attorney asked Park Soo-hong whether he would use housekeeping, and Park Soo-hong was sick of his parents suffering. I do not know why, but he insisted that he come home and clean it. "Defendant I asked Mr. Park to stop his parents, stop him, but he fought, the house was upset, and his mother was completely out of food. So I knew that I had to suffer, but I came. " So the Defendant asked if it was right that he did not use the helper, and Park Soo-hong wondered what the intention was to testify. Therefore, the court did not have to ask Park Soo-hong to find out the intention and ask The Attorney. The Defendant then submits the broadcast screen of the ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ as evidence, and the safe is visible in the corresponding part. It is confirmed that it is a large safe. Park Soo-hong replied, "I did not know there was a safe before." Park Soo-hong replied, "I did not know there was a safe before." Defendant said, "If my Father brought cash, I would not have put it in this safe," Park Soo-hong said. The Defendant, The Attorney, said in 2015 that the Father submitted a letter to the Defendant as evidence, saying that he had put money on the safe, and Park Soo-hong did not know how much money he had left, He said, "Do you claim that I have received 30 million won?" In Park Soo-hong's rebuttal, Defendant released another message and mentioned that ⁇ Father would put 24.5 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong said, "If you have such a big money, I have made a lot of money by selling my car. Defendant gave it to me once. I replied, "I do not have such a big money Memory." Defendant replied that Jessie had another message and ⁇ Defendant put 24.2 million won on the table, and Park Soo-hong replied, "Thank you!" Park Soo-hong asked if there was a Memory that received this money, and Park Soo-hong asked if the money was not the money. Defendant's lawyer said, "It's May. The text is July. I asked him if he had ever received this money. Park Soo-hong answered that he did not have a memory frankly, and this situation continued several times. Park Soo-hong asked if The Attorney is Memorizing the Katok that he shared in 2015. Defendant then claimed that the amount was used as a tax on Park Soo-hong, not seizure, in connection with some of the charges against Jessie in the public hearing, and Park Soo-hong, who saw the evidence, questioned several times. It was pointed out that the court had seizure of 20 million won at that time, but the amount was paid by Park Soo-hong's tax on that day. The Attorney explained that this is not a seizure, so Park Soo-hong agrees and says that it is right to exclude that part. At the trial, the contents related to his wife Kim Da-ye were also mentioned. Defendant The Attorney said he had received 67.69 million won from the ⁇ Lael corporate account to Kim Da-ye's account on November 27, 2019, and asked why the amount was transferred to his wife's Passbook. Park Soo-hong said, "The amount was a management down payment. Defendant said Kim Da-ye had the qualities of an announcer and sent a contract by e-mail, but the contract was not fulfilled, so the tax was damaged and the down payment was returned. DB