What about the 'lover of the century' that overcame the 30-year-old? Resumed mud fight 'in and out'

on
A couple of centuries who overcame the 30-year-old gap have been fighting for truth in court in 10 years: the story of actor Yun-shik Baek (75) and former lover K.The two, who fell in love and had a serious meeting in 2013 despite a whopping 30-year-old difference, meet in court nine years later.The two sides claims are very different over the authenticity of the agreement that Yun-shik Baek applied for a sale ban injunction ahead of Ks Essay publication, which contains privacy, and that he would not disclose the relationship between the two at the time of the separation.The beginning has been known since the fact that lover K mentioned the past privacy with Yun-shik Baek in the autobiographical essay called Alcohol The Surrendered which was scheduled to be published on the 28th of last month.Mr. K, who met Yun-shik Baek, who was 66 at the age of 36 at the time, used the initials T instead of the blindness of Yun-shik Baek to mention marriage and pregnancy plans from his first meeting.I honestly and calmly told the story of the fact that I fell in love with Yun-shik Baek, who did not reveal it properly at the time of the 2013 scandal, as well as the whole process of separation, as well as the process of suffering from unimaginable evils, I explained.Mr. K also expressed his position directly that the Essay was not a criticism or a sniper.Yun-shik Baek, who had not been able to grasp his ex-lovers book Publishing by this time, responded hard.We are currently checking on book publishing, and we will review strong and strict legal action in relation to it, Fantasy Oo said.Prior to the publication of the book, he filed an application for injunction against publication and sales.K filed a complaint against Yun-shik Baek at the Seoul Bangbae Police Station on charges of forgery and the same incident on the 28th when the application for a ban on sale was filed.Yun-shik Baek falsely wrote an agreement containing the prohibition clause without his consent, and filed an injunction based on this.When this fact was announced on February 2, Yun-shik Baek immediately announced that he would sue K for innocence.Mr. K agreed amicably that he would no longer disclose the case with Yun-shik Baek on condition that he would withdraw the lawsuit filed by Yun-shik Baek at the time, and confirmed that he signed the agreement directly, K said. K Published a book related to Yun-shik Baek, He denied the existence of the agreement signed by him and is proceeding with criminal charges. I express my strong regret for Mr. K, who is already publishing the book, referring to the blindness of Yun-shik Baek actor to stimulate public curiosity about the issue that was concluded by amicable agreement between the parties eight years ago.However, Mr. Ks position on the existence of the agreement is 180 degrees different.K said, I have never seen an agreement that I will not disclose to the outside world about the meeting with Yun-shik Baek. He forged a document that stolen signatures to prevent publication.Its an incomprehensible irrationality, he retorted.The two sides are in a completely different position on the existence of the agreement and are working on the truth.Here, Yun-shik Baeks position to file a criminal complaint is on the verge of a muddy legal battle of the old couple of the century.
A couple of centuries who overcame the 30-year-old gap have been fighting for truth in court in 10 years: the story of actor Yun-shik Baek (75) and former lover K.The two, who fell in love and had a serious meeting in 2013 despite a whopping 30-year-old difference, meet in court nine years later.The two sides claims are very different over the authenticity of the agreement that Yun-shik Baek applied for a sale ban injunction ahead of Ks Essay publication, which contains privacy, and that he would not disclose the relationship between the two at the time of the separation.The beginning has been known since the fact that lover K mentioned the past privacy with Yun-shik Baek in the autobiographical essay called Alcohol The Surrendered which was scheduled to be published on the 28th of last month.Mr. K, who met Yun-shik Baek, who was 66 at the age of 36 at the time, used the initials T instead of the blindness of Yun-shik Baek to mention marriage and pregnancy plans from his first meeting.I honestly and calmly told the story of the fact that I fell in love with Yun-shik Baek, who did not reveal it properly at the time of the 2013 scandal, as well as the whole process of separation, as well as the process of suffering from unimaginable evils, I explained.Mr. K also expressed his position directly that the Essay was not a criticism or a sniper.Yun-shik Baek, who had not been able to grasp his ex-lovers book Publishing by this time, responded hard.We are currently checking on book publishing, and we will review strong and strict legal action in relation to it, Fantasy Oo said.Prior to the publication of the book, he filed an application for injunction against publication and sales.K filed a complaint against Yun-shik Baek at the Seoul Bangbae Police Station on charges of forgery and the same incident on the 28th when the application for a ban on sale was filed.Yun-shik Baek falsely wrote an agreement containing the prohibition clause without his consent, and filed an injunction based on this.When this fact was announced on February 2, Yun-shik Baek immediately announced that he would sue K for innocence.Mr. K agreed amicably that he would no longer disclose the case with Yun-shik Baek on condition that he would withdraw the lawsuit filed by Yun-shik Baek at the time, and confirmed that he signed the agreement directly, K said. K Published a book related to Yun-shik Baek, He denied the existence of the agreement signed by him and is proceeding with criminal charges. I express my strong regret for Mr. K, who is already publishing the book, referring to the blindness of Yun-shik Baek actor to stimulate public curiosity about the issue that was concluded by amicable agreement between the parties eight years ago.However, Mr. Ks position on the existence of the agreement is 180 degrees different.K said, I have never seen an agreement that I will not disclose to the outside world about the meeting with Yun-shik Baek. He forged a document that stolen signatures to prevent publication.Its an incomprehensible irrationality, he retorted.The two sides are in a completely different position on the existence of the agreement and are working on the truth.Here, Yun-shik Baeks position to file a criminal complaint is on the verge of a muddy legal battle of the old couple of the century.
A couple of centuries who overcame the 30-year-old gap have been fighting for truth in court in 10 years: the story of actor Yun-shik Baek (75) and former lover K.The two, who fell in love and had a serious meeting in 2013 despite a whopping 30-year-old difference, meet in court nine years later.The two sides claims are very different over the authenticity of the agreement that Yun-shik Baek applied for a sale ban injunction ahead of Ks Essay publication, which contains privacy, and that he would not disclose the relationship between the two at the time of the separation.The beginning has been known since the fact that lover K mentioned the past privacy with Yun-shik Baek in the autobiographical essay called Alcohol The Surrendered which was scheduled to be published on the 28th of last month.Mr. K, who met Yun-shik Baek, who was 66 at the age of 36 at the time, used the initials T instead of the blindness of Yun-shik Baek to mention marriage and pregnancy plans from his first meeting.I honestly and calmly told the story of the fact that I fell in love with Yun-shik Baek, who did not reveal it properly at the time of the 2013 scandal, as well as the whole process of separation, as well as the process of suffering from unimaginable evils, I explained.Mr. K also expressed his position directly that the Essay was not a criticism or a sniper.Yun-shik Baek, who had not been able to grasp his ex-lovers book Publishing by this time, responded hard.We are currently checking on book publishing, and we will review strong and strict legal action in relation to it, Fantasy Oo said.Prior to the publication of the book, he filed an application for injunction against publication and sales.K filed a complaint against Yun-shik Baek at the Seoul Bangbae Police Station on charges of forgery and the same incident on the 28th when the application for a ban on sale was filed.Yun-shik Baek falsely wrote an agreement containing the prohibition clause without his consent, and filed an injunction based on this.When this fact was announced on February 2, Yun-shik Baek immediately announced that he would sue K for innocence.Mr. K agreed amicably that he would no longer disclose the case with Yun-shik Baek on condition that he would withdraw the lawsuit filed by Yun-shik Baek at the time, and confirmed that he signed the agreement directly, K said. K Published a book related to Yun-shik Baek, He denied the existence of the agreement signed by him and is proceeding with criminal charges. I express my strong regret for Mr. K, who is already publishing the book, referring to the blindness of Yun-shik Baek actor to stimulate public curiosity about the issue that was concluded by amicable agreement between the parties eight years ago.However, Mr. Ks position on the existence of the agreement is 180 degrees different.K said, I have never seen an agreement that I will not disclose to the outside world about the meeting with Yun-shik Baek. He forged a document that stolen signatures to prevent publication.Its an incomprehensible irrationality, he retorted.The two sides are in a completely different position on the existence of the agreement and are working on the truth.Here, Yun-shik Baeks position to file a criminal complaint is on the verge of a muddy legal battle of the old couple of the century.

A couple of centuries who overcame the 30-year-old gap have been fighting for truth in court in 10 years: the story of actor Yun-shik Baek (75) and former lover K.

The two, who fell in love and had a serious meeting in 2013 despite a whopping 30-year-old difference, meet in court nine years later. The two sides' claims are very different over the authenticity of the agreement that Yun-shik Baek applied for a sale ban injunction ahead of K's Essay publication, which contains privacy, and that he would not disclose the relationship between the two at the time of the separation.

The beginning has been known since the fact that lover K mentioned the past privacy with Yun-shik Baek in the autobiographical Essay called 'Alcohol The Surrendered' which was scheduled to be published on the 28th of last month. Mr. K, who met Yun-shik Baek, who was 66 at the age of 36 at the time, used the initials "T" instead of the blindness of Yun-shik Baek to mention marriage and pregnancy plans from his first meeting.

"I honestly and calmly told the story of the fact that I fell in love with Yun-shik Baek, who did not reveal it properly at the time of the 2013 scandal, as well as the whole process of separation, as well as the process of suffering from unimaginable evils, I explained. Mr. K also expressed his position directly that the Essay was not a criticism or a sniper.

Yun-shik Baek, who had not been able to grasp his ex-lover's book Publishing by this time, responded hard. "We are currently checking on book Publishing, and we will review strong and strict legal action in relation to it," Fantasy Oo said. Prior to the publication of the book, he filed an application for injunction against publication and sales.

K filed a complaint against Yun-shik Baek at the Seoul Bangbae Police Station on charges of forgery and the same incident on the 28th when the application for a ban on sale was filed. Yun-shik Baek falsely wrote an agreement containing the prohibition clause without his consent, and filed an injunction based on this.

When this fact was announced on February 2, Yun-shik Baek immediately announced that he would sue K for innocence. "Mr. K agreed amicably that he would no longer disclose the case with Yun-shik Baek on condition that he would withdraw the lawsuit filed by Yun-shik Baek at the time, and confirmed that he signed the agreement directly," K said. "K Published a book related to Yun-shik Baek, He denied the existence of the agreement signed by him and is proceeding with criminal charges. " "I express my strong regret for Mr. K, who is already Publishing the book, referring to the blindness of Yun-shik Baek actor to stimulate public curiosity about the issue that was concluded by amicable agreement between the parties eight years ago."

However, Mr. K's position on the existence of the agreement is 180 degrees different. K said, "I have never seen an agreement that I will not disclose to the outside world about the meeting with Yun-shik Baek." He forged a document that stolen signatures to prevent publication. "It's an incomprehensible irrationality," he retorted.

The two sides are in a completely different position on the existence of the agreement and are working on the truth. Here, Yun-shik Baek's position to file a criminal complaint is on the verge of a muddy legal battle of the old 'couple of the century'.