Singer Kim Heung-Gook and Im Chang-jung's Covid19 Vacine inoculation became a 'hot potato'. Kim Heung-Gook has been discussing the issue of not inoculating Vaccine, and Im Chang-jung has been confirmed to have Covid19 during his activities in the unvaccinated state. In some cases, he is discussing whether or not he is inoculated with Vaccine in the entertainment industry.
First of all, Kim Heung-Gook made a big deal on a Vaccine-related statement on a YouTube channel on the 5th. Asked at the time why he did not Vaccine inoculation, he replied, "Why do you put that cheap stuff on me?"
Kim Heung-Gook's comments were attributed to an on-Line rumor that 'Vaccine prices of one brand are cheaper than other Vaccine'. Vacine inoculation is an individual's choice and can be freely made, but on the other hand, it has been pointed out that influential entertainers are promoting unconfirmed news.
In the case of Im Chang-jung, he was confirmed while he was in the comeback activity while he was unvaccinated; he released his regular 17th album on the 1st and appeared in entertainment, music broadcasting, and so on. On the 8th, he attended the marriage ceremony of singer Lee Ji-hoon and sang a celebration.
In the comeback showcase that was held earlier this month, it was confirmed that fans demanded a Vacine Pass or PCR test. In addition to entertainment activities, additional businesses such as liquor stores are also being carried out, and negative public opinion has been formed that they are acting without responsibility. Im Chang-jung has apologized for failing to coordinate the inoculation schedule because he has been working on Jeju and Seoul.
The two became a representative example of the entertainer Vaccine inoculation, and at the same time, they caused the netizens to overwhelm the Vaccine inoculation. It is a job to meet an unspecified number of people, and most of the time, it is argued that it should show the initiative as it is most of the time to take off the mask.
However, some say that vacine inoculation is 'freedom of the individual', and it is unreasonable to apply other standards as entertainers. There is also an opinion that it is necessary to take a cautious attitude rather than unconditional criticism as 'breaking Infection' continues after inoculation.
However, there is no doubt that self-prevention should be thoroughly done. Although it is not necessary to disclose whether or not vacine inoculation is a private area, it is widely believed that it is necessary to prevent confusion that can be caused by Infection by trying to prevent individual vaccination such as inoculation or periodic inspection.