"Kim Jung-hyun Gaslighting?" Seao Ye-ji SMS, Is it illegal?

As expected, there was a common romantic relationship, a devastating and devastating aftermath.Like a series of cases, this time, the woman side of the gender pay gap suffers a serious real loss.Actor Seo Ye-ji is surrounded by personality noise, school violence (academic), forgery of academic background, and controversy over staffing, which is whether he manipulated his ex-boyfriend actor Kim Jung-hyun, and he is taking various losses such as termination of CF contract.So, is there a legal responsibility to the famous entertainer Seo Ye-ji that can actually be applied?One recent media outlet cited the reason why actor Kim Jung-hyun requested to delete the romance scene with his opponent Seo Hyun in the past drama Time as Seo Ye-ji.The SMS conversation history was released during the couples lovers, and it was revealed that Seo Ye-ji called Kim Jung-hyun as his nickname Kim Ttuk-tuk and asked him to delete the romance scene in the drama.This is a kind of gaslighting toward Kim Jung-hyun of Seo Ye-ji, and criticism against him is getting stronger.On the 13th, Seo Ye-jis agency explained that Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun were true, but this is a common emotional fight in the gender pay gap relationship, and Kim Jung-hyeun also tried to control the skinship in the work of Seo Ye-ji.Seo Ye-ji did not listen to Kim Jung-hyuns request and digested all the romance scenes in his work as customary.On the other hand, Kim Jung-hyuns response to the request of Seo Ye-ji himself stated that this was his choice in the gender pay gap relationship.So could this SMS act of Seo Ye-ji be classified as a subject of legal punishment: According to legal circles, Gaslighting of love cannot be held legally responsible for itself.Of course, if a part of the gaslighting process or result is found to violate the law, it is subject to punishment.However, the Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun SMS contents reported by the media can not find the illegality of the Seo Ye-ji side.This is a private feeling between Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun as explained by Seo Ye-jis agency, and it is not the basis for legal responsibility for companies that are currently used as models.Nevertheless, the appearance of the drama Ireland, in which Seo Ye-ji was scheduled to appear, was not revealed. Various companies that used Seo Ye-ji as a model also decided to cut model contracts.What happened? The part where he damaged the company is not proven by the figures.However, the anti-moral act of the gender pay gap relationship that attempted gaslighting to the opponent during the love process can be pointed out in the social anti-emotional dimension.In other words, the elegant intangible image assets unique to Seo Ye-ji have been damaged, which is interpreted as a case in which the Korean societys specific gaze and emotion of Korean pop artists are applied to Seo Ye-ji without filtration.If the Seo Ye-ji boycott movement (boycott) is actually spreading in the future, Seo Ye-ji or the agency should take legal profit loss.This will also be limited to cases where (for example, the companys) loss details are actually proven in court.Nevertheless, the controversy over the history of Seo Ye-ji, which bursts like Domino, has had an indirect adverse effect on his suspension of anti-force activities.Seo Ye-ji said he had studied in Spain for three and a half years through past broadcasts.As a result of confirming the fact, it is true that he received a notice of acceptance from the Spanish University, but he could not carry out his academic activities in Spain as his domestic activities became full-scale.However, this is also a backbone phenomenon of Kim Jung-hyuns theory of manipulation, and it has not been proved that the forgery of academic achievement itself has caused damage to the company that used the model of Seo Ye-ji.There have also been suspicions that Seo Ye-ji was a perpetrator of school violence in the past, but the agency has denied it as obvious.To make matters worse, a netizen raised the suspicion of Seo Ye-jis field staff, which in this case, the direction of the witness is diverted.Another staff member has stepped up to defend the Seo Ye-ji personality in a refutation.Therefore, the two previous controversies are also unclear rumors at present, and it is unlikely that they will spread to court battles.The two actors had a relationship that was sometimes geological and sometimes enjoyable, like a normal non-entertainer, Gender pay gap.At this time, it is the male actor who caused the damage to the staff by directing the variables at the drama shooting scene.Nevertheless, the female actor is dealing with an unexpected mental and physical crisis just because she has revealed her personal feelings such as jealousy between lovers.Some people say, It will be possible to classify it as a case like CC (campus couple). It is always a woman who quit or suffers damage after separation (clubs, workplaces, etc.) when a man or woman is in a reality such as school or work.Seo Ye-ji also presented a metaphor of concern that he was being hunted by a witch under a prejudiced criticism of people. All rights reserved.
As expected, there was a common romantic relationship, a devastating and devastating aftermath.Like a series of cases, this time, the woman side of the gender pay gap suffers a serious real loss.Actor Seo Ye-ji is surrounded by personality noise, school violence (academic), forgery of academic background, and controversy over staffing, which is whether he manipulated his ex-boyfriend actor Kim Jung-hyun, and he is taking various losses such as termination of CF contract.So, is there a legal responsibility to the famous entertainer Seo Ye-ji that can actually be applied?One recent media outlet cited the reason why actor Kim Jung-hyun requested to delete the romance scene with his opponent Seo Hyun in the past drama Time as Seo Ye-ji.The SMS conversation history was released during the couples lovers, and it was revealed that Seo Ye-ji called Kim Jung-hyun as his nickname Kim Ttuk-tuk and asked him to delete the romance scene in the drama.This is a kind of gaslighting toward Kim Jung-hyun of Seo Ye-ji, and criticism against him is getting stronger.On the 13th, Seo Ye-jis agency explained that Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun were true, but this is a common emotional fight in the gender pay gap relationship, and Kim Jung-hyeun also tried to control the skinship in the work of Seo Ye-ji.Seo Ye-ji did not listen to Kim Jung-hyuns request and digested all the romance scenes in his work as customary.On the other hand, Kim Jung-hyuns response to the request of Seo Ye-ji himself stated that this was his choice in the gender pay gap relationship.So could this SMS act of Seo Ye-ji be classified as a subject of legal punishment: According to legal circles, Gaslighting of love cannot be held legally responsible for itself.Of course, if a part of the gaslighting process or result is found to violate the law, it is subject to punishment.However, the Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun SMS contents reported by the media can not find the illegality of the Seo Ye-ji side.This is a private feeling between Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun as explained by Seo Ye-jis agency, and it is not the basis for legal responsibility for companies that are currently used as models.Nevertheless, the appearance of the drama Ireland, in which Seo Ye-ji was scheduled to appear, was not revealed. Various companies that used Seo Ye-ji as a model also decided to cut model contracts.What happened? The part where he damaged the company is not proven by the figures.However, the anti-moral act of the gender pay gap relationship that attempted gaslighting to the opponent during the love process can be pointed out in the social anti-emotional dimension.In other words, the elegant intangible image assets unique to Seo Ye-ji have been damaged, which is interpreted as a case in which the Korean societys specific gaze and emotion of Korean pop artists are applied to Seo Ye-ji without filtration.If the Seo Ye-ji boycott movement (boycott) is actually spreading in the future, Seo Ye-ji or the agency should take legal profit loss.This will also be limited to cases where (for example, the companys) loss details are actually proven in court.Nevertheless, the controversy over the history of Seo Ye-ji, which bursts like Domino, has had an indirect adverse effect on his suspension of anti-force activities.Seo Ye-ji said he had studied in Spain for three and a half years through past broadcasts.As a result of confirming the fact, it is true that he received a notice of acceptance from the Spanish University, but he could not carry out his academic activities in Spain as his domestic activities became full-scale.However, this is also a backbone phenomenon of Kim Jung-hyuns theory of manipulation, and it has not been proved that the forgery of academic achievement itself has caused damage to the company that used the model of Seo Ye-ji.There have also been suspicions that Seo Ye-ji was a perpetrator of school violence in the past, but the agency has denied it as obvious.To make matters worse, a netizen raised the suspicion of Seo Ye-jis field staff, which in this case, the direction of the witness is diverted.Another staff member has stepped up to defend the Seo Ye-ji personality in a refutation.Therefore, the two previous controversies are also unclear rumors at present, and it is unlikely that they will spread to court battles.The two actors had a relationship that was sometimes geological and sometimes enjoyable, like a normal non-entertainer, Gender pay gap.At this time, it is the male actor who caused the damage to the staff by directing the variables at the drama shooting scene.Nevertheless, the female actor is dealing with an unexpected mental and physical crisis just because she has revealed her personal feelings such as jealousy between lovers.Some people say, It will be possible to classify it as a case like CC (campus couple). It is always a woman who quit or suffers damage after separation (clubs, workplaces, etc.) when a man or woman is in a reality such as school or work.Seo Ye-ji also presented a metaphor of concern that he was being hunted by a witch under a prejudiced criticism of people. All rights reserved.

As expected, there was a common romantic relationship, a devastating and devastating aftermath. Like a series of cases, this time, the woman side of the gender pay gap suffers a serious real loss. Actor Seo Ye-ji is surrounded by personality noise, school violence (academic), forgery of academic background, and controversy over staffing, which is whether he manipulated his ex-boyfriend actor Kim Jung-hyun, and he is taking various losses such as termination of CF contract. So, is there a legal responsibility to the famous entertainer Seo Ye-ji that can actually be applied?

One recent media outlet cited the reason why actor Kim Jung-hyun requested to delete the romance scene with his opponent Seo Hyun in the past drama Time as Seo Ye-ji. The SMS conversation history was released during the couple's lovers, and it was revealed that Seo Ye-ji called Kim Jung-hyun as his nickname Kim Ttuk-tuk and asked him to delete the romance scene in the drama. This is a kind of gaslighting toward Kim Jung-hyun of Seo Ye-ji, and criticism against him is getting stronger.

On the 13th, Seo Ye-ji's agency explained that Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun were true, but this is a common emotional fight in the gender pay gap relationship, and Kim Jung-hyeun also tried to control the skinship in the work of Seo Ye-ji. Seo Ye-ji did not listen to Kim Jung-hyun's request and digested all the romance scenes in his work as customary. On the other hand, Kim Jung-hyun's response to the request of Seo Ye-ji himself stated that this was his choice in the gender pay gap relationship.

So could this SMS act of Seo Ye-ji be classified as a subject of legal punishment: According to legal circles, Gaslighting of love cannot be held legally responsible for itself. Of course, if a part of the gaslighting process or result is found to violate the law, it is subject to punishment. However, the Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun SMS contents reported by the media can not find the illegality of the Seo Ye-ji side. This is a private feeling between Seo Ye-ji and Kim Jung-hyun as explained by Seo Ye-ji's agency, and it is not the basis for legal responsibility for companies that are currently used as models.

Nevertheless, the appearance of the drama "Ireland", in which Seo Ye-ji was scheduled to appear, was not revealed. Various companies that used Seo Ye-ji as a model also decided to cut model contracts. What happened? The part where he damaged the company is not proven by the figures. However, the 'anti-moral' act of the gender pay gap relationship that attempted gaslighting to the opponent during the love process can be pointed out in the social anti-emotional dimension. In other words, the elegant intangible image assets unique to Seo Ye-ji have been damaged, which is interpreted as a case in which the Korean society's specific gaze and emotion of Korean pop artists are applied to Seo Ye-ji without filtration. If the Seo Ye-ji boycott movement (boycott) is actually spreading in the future, Seo Ye-ji or the agency should take legal profit loss. This will also be limited to cases where (for example, the company's) loss details are actually proven in court.

Nevertheless, the controversy over the history of Seo Ye-ji, which bursts like Domino, has had an indirect adverse effect on his suspension of anti-force activities. Seo Ye-ji said he had studied in Spain for three and a half years through past broadcasts. As a result of confirming the fact, it is true that he received a notice of acceptance from the Spanish University, but he could not carry out his academic activities in Spain as his domestic activities became full-scale. However, this is also a backbone phenomenon of Kim Jung-hyun's theory of manipulation, and it has not been proved that the forgery of academic achievement itself has caused damage to the company that used the model of Seo Ye-ji.

There have also been suspicions that Seo Ye-ji was a perpetrator of school violence in the past, but the agency has denied it as obvious. To make matters worse, a netizen raised the suspicion of Seo Ye-ji's field staff, which in this case, the direction of the witness is diverted. Another staff member has stepped up to defend the Seo Ye-ji personality in a refutation. Therefore, the two previous controversies are also unclear rumors at present, and it is unlikely that they will spread to court battles.

The two actors had a relationship that was sometimes geological and sometimes enjoyable, like a normal non-entertainer, Gender pay gap. At this time, it is the male actor who caused the damage to the staff by directing the variables at the drama shooting scene. Nevertheless, the female actor is dealing with an unexpected mental and physical crisis just because she has revealed her personal feelings such as jealousy between lovers. Some people say, "It will be possible to classify it as a case like CC (campus couple). It is always a woman who quit or suffers damage after separation (clubs, workplaces, etc.) when a man or woman is in a reality such as school or work. Seo Ye-ji also presented a metaphor of concern that he was being hunted by a witch under a prejudiced criticism of people. "

All rights reserved.