The beginning is a dispute between the representatives of the former agency. Actor Lee Sun-bin is one of the Actors who became Innocent Witness in the fight between former Well-Made Yedang Chairman Byun Moo (hereinafter Yedang, Byun) and former W.Wide Entertainment CEO Seo Moo (hereinafter Double Jeopardy, Seo). Byeon and Seo have been engaged in a legal battle over W.W.I.D. ownership since 2018. Lee Sun-bin went to Innocent Witness that year and testified that ⁇ W. Waidy was Mr. On the other hand, the appeals court ruled in favor of Seo. The second trial court found that Lee Sun-bin stated in a 2016 prosecution investigation conducted before the trial that ⁇ W. Waidi was Mr. Seo's company. The court directly called Lee Sun-bin to the Innocent Witness seat and asked why he overturned the statement. Here's Lee Sun-bin's answer to why he reversed his statement: "Before that, we (Lee Sun-bin, Jin Ji-hee) were caught in the first lawsuit of Imagine Asia, and it was disadvantageous, so we gathered and talked about what we should do. At that time, he said, "If you tell the truth, you have to make a statement because it is a disadvantage now." Lee Sun-bin and Jin Ji-hee met separately and agreed on a false statement, which means that the reason for not telling the truth is due to Mr. At the same time, it can be interpreted that his prosecution statement on Seo's side in 2016 is closer to the truth, which is why Lee Sun-bin can not be free from the controversy over false statements raised in the war. Based on this, the 2 nd trial court ruled that W. Waidi was the capital of Mr. Seo and that he was established in his name. The reason why Lee Sun-bin mentioned Jin Ji-hee was because they had been together at one time. In the past, the two companies were Yedang, Imagine Asia, and W.Wide, Lee Juck. The three companies are operated by executives who worked at Yedang, but they are separate companies. W. Waidi The parties to the ownership struggle, Mr. Seo and Mr. Seo, are the seniors who started the kite in Yedang. Lee Sun-bin's reference to Jin Ji-hee comes from another incident: In 2016, Yedang changes its mission to Imagine Asia. Mr. Byun, who was the largest shareholder of Yedang at the time, transferred his 8.94% stake to Company A, which caused a complicated ownership dispute. A company, Lee Sun-bin, Jin Ji-hee and three other Imagine Asia Actors, Lee Sun-bin, Jin Ji-hee, Lee Ji-hee, Lee Ji-hee, Lee Sun-bin, and Jin Ji-hee. The lawsuit mentioned by Lee Sun-bin in the court asking for the reason for the reversal of the statement refers to this case, in which A filed a lawsuit against Jin Ji-hee and himself in the court for damages and prohibition of activities. "What was the result of the lawsuit?" Lee Sun-bin, Jin Ji-hee, Company A claimed that Double Jeopardy was Byeon's company, but the court ruled that W.ID was Seo's and therefore did not steal the Actors. In a separate case, Seo was also recognized as the company's owner. Lee Sun-bin's mention of Jin Ji-hee in the process of explaining the 'statement reversal' is a big controversy. At the time of the lawsuit, Lee Sun-bin stated that W. Waidi was Mr. Seo, and another Mother, Jin Ji-hee's Mother, made the same statement as Lee Sun-bin on behalf of her underage daughter. Jin Ji-hee's Mother stated that Lee Sun-bin's testimony was "not true" when her daughter's name was mentioned as the reason for the reversal. Jin Ji-hee's Mother told a media outlet that ⁇ Lee Sun-bin's court testimony (2022 appellate statement) is not true. Jin Ji-hee dismissed the fact that he had not talked with Lee Sun-bin about what to do (for the statement). Jin Ji-hee's Mother directly refuted Lee Sun-bin's testimony that she was having a meal with her daughter. If the testimony is accepted as fact, Jin Ji-hee promises perjury with Lee Sun-bin It seems to be because it becomes. It was for her daughter, but Lee Sun-bin had another lie tag. Lee Sun-bin is reacting sensitively every time the case is reported. "I can understand it." Actors have been consumed for a long time in the company's interest dispute, so they may feel 'mental distress'. However, 'reversal of the statement', which can have a great influence on the judgment, can not be rationalized. After Lee Sun-bin's "reversal of the statement" became controversial, a petition was posted on the website of the National People's Petition to introduce a "crime of obstruction of justice". Even though "reversal of statements" is not subject to judicial action under current law, Lee Sun-bin's explanation of "I'm not at fault" is certainly problematic, and it is regrettable that he mentioned the name of his fellow Actor who "did not have such a fact."