"I will bet on the pride of my teacher's life...the homeroom teacher and 20 alumni, Nam Joo-hyuk refuted the allegations of 'School violence'

Actor Nam Joo-hyuks allegations of school violence are not true, and his alma mater homeroom teacher and committee, 20 people, took off their feet.Twenty people, including Nam Joo-hyuks Stoneman Douglas High School shooting committee and two homeroom teachers, refuted Nam Joo-hyuks suspicion of school violence through the entertainment media dispatch on the 5th.Two of these alumni revealed their real names and went to the interview.The allegations of school violence surrounding Nam Joo-hyuk were first raised on the 20th of last month.Mo online media reported that Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni A of Nam Joo-hyuk claimed to have suffered school violence from Nam Joo-hyuk for about six years from middle school to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.A, a student at Nam Joo-hyuk, called Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni, claimed that Nam Joo-hyuk had been in a group of so-called Work with and that there were not one or two students who had been bullied by the group.Friends who have been severely affected by School violence are far from watching TV, he said. I am receiving psychiatric treatment.On the 28th of last month, Whistle Blower B claimed that he suffered school violence such as bread shuttle, forced sparring, and paid payment of smartphone.In this regard, Nam Joo-hyuks alumni and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting first and third grade homeroom teachers refuted the allegations raised by Mr. A. B.I really do not know the school atmosphere, said an alumni who said he was in the same class as Nam Joo-hyuk.If there were some people who felt like a group of friends with a Work with, there was no Nam Joo-hyuk in such a group. Other alumni who said Nam Joo-hyuk and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting second and third graders were in the same class, said: Our school was severely corporal at the time.It was very strict. There was not much of a concept of Work with crowd. What Friends were constantly harassed?It would have been a mess if you knew.As for the suspicion of the bread shuttle, he said, I can say that it is a false lie. I was trying to write directly to the community because I was so ridiculous when I saw the report.Another Committee said: I did a so-called breading out. I always went to the canteen with Juhyuk and bought bread.We bought it at the canteen and ate it. As for sparring, he said, Do you honestly say sparring is a force? Forceful fighting? I do not remember it.Another Committee said, When Juhyuk went to the class during the break, he sometimes hit one or two people in the back seat and played a joke.Ive seen P fight Lindaman because youre with me, which was also irrelevant to Nam Joo-hyuk, he argued.As for the mobile phone payment case, alumni made a consistent statement, saying that another student P was charged with a paid payment on his teachers mobile phone.One alumni said: Why do you bring what P did to Nam Joo-hyuk? P was in the same class as (Nam Joo-hyuk) in the first grade.Kidari new X, eat a lot of it, he said. I first started the fight.I will put my pride in my teachers life, it was the time of corporal punishment, and I carried a hawk to my teacher.Even if the mothers beat them, they made a hawk to make children and gave them to the teachers.At least I can not have such a school violence at the time I taught. A third-grade homeroom teacher also said, Do not judge the life of a person with one unilateral story. I am angry at malicious false reports.If you have done something wrong, you should be responsible, but it is wrong to bury one person with false facts. The agency added: We are keen that the truth will be clarified through a speedy investigation and that the disgraced honor of Nam Joo-hyuk will be restored.
Actor Nam Joo-hyuks allegations of school violence are not true, and his alma mater homeroom teacher and committee, 20 people, took off their feet.Twenty people, including Nam Joo-hyuks Stoneman Douglas High School shooting committee and two homeroom teachers, refuted Nam Joo-hyuks suspicion of school violence through the entertainment media dispatch on the 5th.Two of these alumni revealed their real names and went to the interview.The allegations of school violence surrounding Nam Joo-hyuk were first raised on the 20th of last month.Mo online media reported that Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni A of Nam Joo-hyuk claimed to have suffered school violence from Nam Joo-hyuk for about six years from middle school to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.A, a student at Nam Joo-hyuk, called Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni, claimed that Nam Joo-hyuk had been in a group of so-called Work with and that there were not one or two students who had been bullied by the group.Friends who have been severely affected by School violence are far from watching TV, he said. I am receiving psychiatric treatment.On the 28th of last month, Whistle Blower B claimed that he suffered school violence such as bread shuttle, forced sparring, and paid payment of smartphone.In this regard, Nam Joo-hyuks alumni and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting first and third grade homeroom teachers refuted the allegations raised by Mr. A. B.I really do not know the school atmosphere, said an alumni who said he was in the same class as Nam Joo-hyuk.If there were some people who felt like a group of friends with a Work with, there was no Nam Joo-hyuk in such a group. Other alumni who said Nam Joo-hyuk and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting second and third graders were in the same class, said: Our school was severely corporal at the time.It was very strict. There was not much of a concept of Work with crowd. What Friends were constantly harassed?It would have been a mess if you knew.As for the suspicion of the bread shuttle, he said, I can say that it is a false lie. I was trying to write directly to the community because I was so ridiculous when I saw the report.Another Committee said: I did a so-called breading out. I always went to the canteen with Juhyuk and bought bread.We bought it at the canteen and ate it. As for sparring, he said, Do you honestly say sparring is a force? Forceful fighting? I do not remember it.Another Committee said, When Juhyuk went to the class during the break, he sometimes hit one or two people in the back seat and played a joke.Ive seen P fight Lindaman because youre with me, which was also irrelevant to Nam Joo-hyuk, he argued.As for the mobile phone payment case, alumni made a consistent statement, saying that another student P was charged with a paid payment on his teachers mobile phone.One alumni said: Why do you bring what P did to Nam Joo-hyuk? P was in the same class as (Nam Joo-hyuk) in the first grade.Kidari new X, eat a lot of it, he said. I first started the fight.I will put my pride in my teachers life, it was the time of corporal punishment, and I carried a hawk to my teacher.Even if the mothers beat them, they made a hawk to make children and gave them to the teachers.At least I can not have such a school violence at the time I taught. A third-grade homeroom teacher also said, Do not judge the life of a person with one unilateral story. I am angry at malicious false reports.If you have done something wrong, you should be responsible, but it is wrong to bury one person with false facts. The agency added: We are keen that the truth will be clarified through a speedy investigation and that the disgraced honor of Nam Joo-hyuk will be restored.
Actor Nam Joo-hyuks allegations of school violence are not true, and his alma mater homeroom teacher and committee, 20 people, took off their feet.Twenty people, including Nam Joo-hyuks Stoneman Douglas High School shooting committee and two homeroom teachers, refuted Nam Joo-hyuks suspicion of school violence through the entertainment media dispatch on the 5th.Two of these alumni revealed their real names and went to the interview.The allegations of school violence surrounding Nam Joo-hyuk were first raised on the 20th of last month.Mo online media reported that Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni A of Nam Joo-hyuk claimed to have suffered school violence from Nam Joo-hyuk for about six years from middle school to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.A, a student at Nam Joo-hyuk, called Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni, claimed that Nam Joo-hyuk had been in a group of so-called Work with and that there were not one or two students who had been bullied by the group.Friends who have been severely affected by School violence are far from watching TV, he said. I am receiving psychiatric treatment.On the 28th of last month, Whistle Blower B claimed that he suffered school violence such as bread shuttle, forced sparring, and paid payment of smartphone.In this regard, Nam Joo-hyuks alumni and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting first and third grade homeroom teachers refuted the allegations raised by Mr. A. B.I really do not know the school atmosphere, said an alumni who said he was in the same class as Nam Joo-hyuk.If there were some people who felt like a group of friends with a Work with, there was no Nam Joo-hyuk in such a group. Other alumni who said Nam Joo-hyuk and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting second and third graders were in the same class, said: Our school was severely corporal at the time.It was very strict. There was not much of a concept of Work with crowd. What Friends were constantly harassed?It would have been a mess if you knew.As for the suspicion of the bread shuttle, he said, I can say that it is a false lie. I was trying to write directly to the community because I was so ridiculous when I saw the report.Another Committee said: I did a so-called breading out. I always went to the canteen with Juhyuk and bought bread.We bought it at the canteen and ate it. As for sparring, he said, Do you honestly say sparring is a force? Forceful fighting? I do not remember it.Another Committee said, When Juhyuk went to the class during the break, he sometimes hit one or two people in the back seat and played a joke.Ive seen P fight Lindaman because youre with me, which was also irrelevant to Nam Joo-hyuk, he argued.As for the mobile phone payment case, alumni made a consistent statement, saying that another student P was charged with a paid payment on his teachers mobile phone.One alumni said: Why do you bring what P did to Nam Joo-hyuk? P was in the same class as (Nam Joo-hyuk) in the first grade.Kidari new X, eat a lot of it, he said. I first started the fight.I will put my pride in my teachers life, it was the time of corporal punishment, and I carried a hawk to my teacher.Even if the mothers beat them, they made a hawk to make children and gave them to the teachers.At least I can not have such a school violence at the time I taught. A third-grade homeroom teacher also said, Do not judge the life of a person with one unilateral story. I am angry at malicious false reports.If you have done something wrong, you should be responsible, but it is wrong to bury one person with false facts. The agency added: We are keen that the truth will be clarified through a speedy investigation and that the disgraced honor of Nam Joo-hyuk will be restored.

Actor Nam Joo-hyuk's allegations of School violence are not true, and his alma mater homeroom teacher and committee, 20 people, took off their feet.

Twenty people, including Nam Joo-hyuk's Stoneman Douglas High School shooting committee and two homeroom teachers, refuted Nam Joo-hyuk's suspicion of School violence through the entertainment media dispatch on the 5th. Two of these alumni revealed their real names and went to the interview.

The allegations of School violence surrounding Nam Joo-hyuk were first raised on the 20th of last month. Mo online media reported that Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni A of Nam Joo-hyuk claimed to have suffered School violence from Nam Joo-hyuk for about six years from middle school to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.

A, a student at Nam Joo-hyuk, called Stoneman Douglas High School shooting alumni, claimed that Nam Joo-hyuk had been in a group of so-called 'Work with' and that there were not one or two students who had been bullied by the group. "Friends who have been severely affected by School violence are far from watching TV," he said. "I am receiving psychiatric treatment." On the 28th of last month, Whistle Blower B claimed that he suffered School violence such as bread shuttle, forced sparring, and paid payment of smartphone.

In this regard, Nam Joo-hyuk's alumni and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting first and third grade homeroom teachers refuted the allegations raised by Mr. A. B.

"I really do not know the school atmosphere," said an alumni who said he was in the same class as Nam Joo-hyuk. If there were some people who felt like a group of Friends with a Work with, there was no Nam Joo-hyuk in such a group. "

Other alumni who said Nam Joo-hyuk and Stoneman Douglas High School shooting second and third graders were in the same class, said: "Our school was severely corporal at the time. It was very strict. There was not much of a concept of Work with crowd. What Friends were constantly harassed?It would have been a mess if you knew." As for the suspicion of the bread shuttle, he said, "I can say that it is a false lie. I was trying to write directly to the community because I was so ridiculous when I saw the report."

Another Committee said: "I did a so-called 'breading out'. I always went to the canteen with Juhyuk and bought bread. We bought it at the canteen and ate it. "

As for sparring, he said, "Do you honestly say sparring is a force? Forceful fighting? I do not remember it." Another Committee said, "When Juhyuk went to the class during the break, he sometimes hit one or two people in the back seat and played a joke. I've seen P fight Lindaman because you're with me, which was also irrelevant to Nam Joo-hyuk," he argued.

As for the mobile phone payment case, alumni made a consistent statement, saying that another student P was charged with a paid payment on his teacher's mobile phone. One alumni said: "Why do you bring what P did to Nam Joo-hyuk? P was in the same class as (Nam Joo-hyuk) in the first grade. "Kidari new X, eat a lot of it," he said. "I first started the fight."

"I will put my pride in my teacher's life, it was the time of corporal punishment, and I carried a hawk to my teacher. Even if the mothers beat them, they made a hawk to make children and gave them to the teachers. At least I can not have such a School violence at the time I taught. "

A third-grade homeroom teacher also said, "Do not judge the life of a person with one unilateral story." "I am angry at malicious false reports. If you have done something wrong, you should be responsible, but it is wrong to bury one person with false facts. "

The agency added: "We are keen that the truth will be clarified through a speedy investigation and that the disgraced honor of Nam Joo-hyuk will be restored."