Salt, a headwind sung by the Chicky Choices

on
Is this noise marketing? Common sense does not work in the world of salt.Rapper Salt is being beaten up by a series of disappointing moves.On November 4, the official SNS said, We agreed with the original author to pay all the proceeds of the products that were related to Copyright to the original author.I apologize for the fact that I have not been able to confirm it beforehand, and I apologize to the original author and all buyers once again, he added.The original author, Corinna Marin, accepted the apology, and paid the original author 400 million won in profits from the sale of a t-shirt, which was paid as a copyright fee or plagiarism.Despite the second apology of the salt, the publics attention is stinging because of a series of recent controversies.Mnet Show Me Money judge is already on the board due to fairness and bias controversy.It was a turn of the eye that Choices was overwhelmed by the pouring criticism.It was enough to be pointed out that Rapper Mommyson was not trying to avoid the public anger by creating a new controversy with Distract that he had signed slaves against minor Rappers.However, the salting, which did not work by the Mommyson rebuttal, and did not properly rebut it, said, It is right that it is not even like an adult.However, even in the midst of going to the country like this, do not treat the people who liked me as a child. The design plagiarism T-shirt sales case was added to this, and the bombs that broke in a month led to disappointment about the salting.Especially at the time of the first apology, the excuse of I knew now that the original author was separate only revealed the consciousness of Copyright, but it was not a immunity.It is right to use the single album 9ucci (Gucci) cover image released in July, and then to publicize Goods through public SNS and YouTube and display imports, while selling it publicly and commercially, I did not even think about the original author or I did not think about Copyright.The image began with a fan synthesizing it for fun in June and posting it in a hip-hop community.I do not know what route the salter got Image, but if I asked the publisher about commercial use, I would have known enough that there was an original author.If the fan was the original author, this would also be an unauthorized use of Image without consent because it was a fan.Even if you synthesized it yourself, you would have had to find Image, and in the process you could find the original author. The process of paying the price was omitted as self-indulgence.

Is this noise marketing? Common sense does not work in the world of salt.

Rapper Salt is being beaten up by a series of disappointing moves.

On November 4, the official SNS said, "We agreed with the original author to pay all the proceeds of the products that were related to Copyright to the original author." "I apologize for the fact that I have not been able to confirm it beforehand, and I apologize to the original author and all buyers once again," he added.

The original author, Corinna Marin, accepted the apology, and paid the original author 400 million won in profits from the sale of a t-shirt, which was paid as a "Copyright fee" or "plagiarism".

Despite the second apology of the salt, the public's attention is stinging because of a series of recent controversies. Mnet 'Show Me Money' judge is already on the board due to fairness and bias controversy.

It was a turn of the eye that Choices was overwhelmed by the pouring criticism. It was enough to be pointed out that Rapper Mommyson was not trying to avoid the public anger by creating a new controversy with Distract that he had signed slaves against minor Rappers.

However, the salting, which did not work by the Mommyson rebuttal, and did not properly rebut it, said, "It is right that it is not even like an adult. However, even in the midst of going to the country like this, do not treat the people who liked me as a child. "

The design plagiarism T-shirt sales case was added to this, and the bombs that broke in a month led to disappointment about the salting. Especially at the time of the first apology, the excuse of "I knew now that the original author was separate" only revealed the consciousness of Copyright, but it was not a immunity.

It is right to use the single album "9ucci" (Gucci) cover Image released in July, and then to publicize Goods through public SNS and YouTube and display imports, while selling it publicly and commercially, "I did not even think about the original author" or "I did not think about Copyright."

The Image began with a fan synthesizing it for fun in June and posting it in a hip-hop community. I do not know what route the salter got Image, but if I asked the publisher about commercial use, I would have known enough that there was an original author. If the fan was the original author, this would also be an unauthorized use of Image without consent because it was a fan. Even if you synthesized it yourself, you would have had to find Image, and in the process you could find the original author. The process of paying the price was omitted as 'self-indulgence'.