A basketball player-turned-broadcaster, Hyun Joo-yup, has taken legal action, strongly denying the recent allegations of forced Sex trafficking. In fact, it is time to watch out for unambiguous situations and unilateral criticism.
On August 8, the Democratic Party of the law firm, which is the legal representative of Hyun Joo-yup, said on August 8, "The contents of the Disclosure of the lawyer, The Attorney of the suspect who falsely raised the suspicion of School violence against Hyun Joo-yup, are not true."
Earlier, Mr. A claimed that he had been subjected to School violence by Hyun Joo-yup through the online community. Hyun Joo-yup assaulted juniors during his studies at Korea University and Disclosureed snacks. At that time, Hyun Joo-hye sued A for defamation, and the case was recently sent to the prosecution for prosecution.
Even after being sent to the prosecution, Mr. A continued Disclosure, followed by Mr. A's Disclosure to The Attorney. Mr. A The Attorney claimed that Hyun Joo-yup forced his juniors to take sex tricking to the Sex tricking business while attending Korea University, and beat them if they refused. In addition, he said that there were even younger students who got sexually transmitted diseases due to these coercion.
"Mr. A and The Attorney have consistently demanded that Hyun Joo-yup withdraw the charges and suspend all broadcasting activities, or have done Blackmail – Cinémix Par Chloé, to do additional Disclosure," said Hyun Joo-yup. In the end, it is argued that the additional Disclosure was used as a weapon to allow the Hyun Joo-yup to withdraw the complaint and to receive a large amount of money as a settlement. The Hyun Joo-yup legal representative argued that "Hyun Joo-yup refused their request because he was working as a broadcaster, and when he did not bow to the Blackmail – Cinémix Par Chloé of the additional Disclosure, the suspect The Attorney stepped up and made a false Disclosure of the 'househouse', which was not true at all."
Hyun Joo-yup said: "We have already submitted to the Susa agency evidence that Mr. A's Disclosure of the househouse is not true; it has also proved that the evidence submitted by the suspect is not credible. Do not believe in false fact interviews. "The key to ending the conflict in the face of the two sides' claims is the results of the Susa agency's investigation.
Recently, various forms of privacy Disclosure have been conducted for celebrities. In some cases, the allegations are publicly apologized to the victims or the public and suspended broadcasting activities, but in the opposite case, it may be revealed that innocence is revealed after the time of truth investigation. Especially in the case of School violence, it is more difficult and takes a long time to identify the truth because of the nature of dealing with the case at the time of school years. Until the apparent Susa results are revealed, there will have to be no stigmatisation of perpetrators by being swept away by irritating Disclosure.