As broadcasters Park Soo-hong and Brother started a courtroom battle with the Money conflict, only the Aman victim is being created with the privacy Disclosure that blurs the essence of the case.
Kim Dae-eun announcer of KBS Suncheon Broadcasting Station said on April 15, "Some people still search Googleplex as '93 year old Kimda O announcer' and follow my SNS. Unfortunately, I am not Kimda O." He denied when he was identified as Park Soo-hong's 1993 GFriend.
Park Soo-hong has filed a complaint against Brother on the embezzlement of the company on May 5, claiming that he suffered billions of dollars in damage due to Brother, who was in charge of his management. Brother said, "The conflict with Park Soo-hong is due to the 1993 GFriend of Park Soo-hong. Currently, Park Soo-hong's apartment owners were originally Park Soo-hong 95% and mother 5%. On September 16 last year, it was changed to Kim, who was born in 1993. "
This Disclosure soon turned into '93 year old Kimda O' in the Money struggle between Park Soo-hong family. Kim Dae-eun announcer has posted an article denying rumors, but the main Googleplex already has a lot of articles to guess Kim Dae-O mentioned by Brother even if Park Soo-hong name and '93 year old' keyword are combined. Later, the Garrosero Research Institute (Gaseyeon) revealed the real name of the woman mentioned by Brother through live broadcasts on the 12th. Some of them are making a so-called 'Kimda O List' and are turning on their eyes to find the party somehow.
The pattern of family history surrounding the Money problem leading to privacy Disclosure, image What It Always Is is a concern and eventually became a reality. The problem is that the people of Aman are unexpectedly caught up in these struggles and suffer damage. Park Soo-hong's Brother who threw Bait, some YouTubers who consume it as gossip, and the '93 year old Kimda O' blood eye of Bait are leaving a bitter impression.
Meanwhile, lawyer Es Noh Jong-heon, a lawyer for Park Soo-hong, said, "The essence of this incident is embezzlement," and said, "We will accept objective judgments on this incident as a standard of law without any response to unilateral privacy disorder and What It Always Is."