'HouseMaster' discriminant point missing after getting fun and Moral lost

on
SBS All The Butlers has changed: The first big project, Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, doubled the fun, but Moral disappeared.SBS All The Butlers, which was broadcast on March 7, gave a changed atmosphere after the main PD replacement.The Master, which appeared after announcing the start of the first large project, was Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min.Unlike the one where the respected figure was invited as a master, the unexpected face appeared, and the members and viewers were confused.The time when Master confided in his story and got close to the members also disappeared.Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min claimed they were masters of failure but there was no moving reversal Kahaani to back him up.It was just Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min biting and tearing each other and the members laughing and watching.Jung Eun-woo, who watched this, said, I originally had a line review and fun of the master, but I put down a line review.Jung Eun-woo felt intensely as he was Feelings Feelings, which seemed to be without Moral and fun.Even when the members confided in their failure experiences, no serious commitment was achieved; even when they made a serious confession, they were cut off by the talk of Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, and the atmosphere was broken.When Yang Se-hyeong pointed out Tak Jae-huns intervention, Lee Sang-min went over and Prayer with a futile excuse: Theres no one to say when we go home.It was ironic to put up a Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, who had been punished for illegal gambling, as Masters, but the content was even more disappointing.If it was called Master of Failure, at least a deep conversation about failure could be achieved.Feelings, which seemed to have invited guests from any entertainment program, not All The Butlers, were thick.I want to ask why the Master gave Moral down, like Jung Eun-woo.All The Butlers was a program that gave impressions and teachings, not just laughter.Thats why All The Butlers could be differentiated between entertainment programs filled with games and puns.But now All The Butlers is no different from any other entertainment program.Tak Jae-hun, who is good at talking, has only drawn a smile of any entertainment by inviting Lee Sang-min, who has a lot of kyle.The touching Kahaani, which the members have drawn so far, evaporated in an instant.Of course, I understand that I tried to change the atmosphere to the first large project after replacing All The Butlers main PD.But such changes also had to be made in line with the viewers eye level.I had to concentrate on why viewers watched All The Butlers and why All The Butlers was loved.If so, would not there be a misfortune of the present that puts down Moral and follows laughter?I hope that All The Butlers will not lose its unique discriminant point in pursuit of a fresh reversal.
SBS All The Butlers has changed: The first big project, Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, doubled the fun, but Moral disappeared.SBS All The Butlers, which was broadcast on March 7, gave a changed atmosphere after the main PD replacement.The Master, which appeared after announcing the start of the first large project, was Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min.Unlike the one where the respected figure was invited as a master, the unexpected face appeared, and the members and viewers were confused.The time when Master confided in his story and got close to the members also disappeared.Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min claimed they were masters of failure but there was no moving reversal Kahaani to back him up.It was just Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min biting and tearing each other and the members laughing and watching.Jung Eun-woo, who watched this, said, I originally had a line review and fun of the master, but I put down a line review.Jung Eun-woo felt intensely as he was Feelings Feelings, which seemed to be without Moral and fun.Even when the members confided in their failure experiences, no serious commitment was achieved; even when they made a serious confession, they were cut off by the talk of Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, and the atmosphere was broken.When Yang Se-hyeong pointed out Tak Jae-huns intervention, Lee Sang-min went over and Prayer with a futile excuse: Theres no one to say when we go home.It was ironic to put up a Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, who had been punished for illegal gambling, as Masters, but the content was even more disappointing.If it was called Master of Failure, at least a deep conversation about failure could be achieved.Feelings, which seemed to have invited guests from any entertainment program, not All The Butlers, were thick.I want to ask why the Master gave Moral down, like Jung Eun-woo.All The Butlers was a program that gave impressions and teachings, not just laughter.Thats why All The Butlers could be differentiated between entertainment programs filled with games and puns.But now All The Butlers is no different from any other entertainment program.Tak Jae-hun, who is good at talking, has only drawn a smile of any entertainment by inviting Lee Sang-min, who has a lot of kyle.The touching Kahaani, which the members have drawn so far, evaporated in an instant.Of course, I understand that I tried to change the atmosphere to the first large project after replacing All The Butlers main PD.But such changes also had to be made in line with the viewers eye level.I had to concentrate on why viewers watched All The Butlers and why All The Butlers was loved.If so, would not there be a misfortune of the present that puts down Moral and follows laughter?I hope that All The Butlers will not lose its unique discriminant point in pursuit of a fresh reversal.

SBS All The Butlers' has changed: The first big project, Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, doubled the fun, but Moral disappeared.

SBS All The Butlers', which was broadcast on March 7, gave a changed atmosphere after the main PD replacement. The Master, which appeared after announcing the start of the first large project, was Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min. Unlike the one where the respected figure was invited as a Master, the unexpected face appeared, and the members and viewers were confused.

The time when Master confided in his story and got close to the members also disappeared. Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min claimed they were 'Masters of failure' but there was no moving reversal Kahaani to back him up. It was just Tak Jae-hun, Lee Sang-min biting and tearing each other and the members laughing and watching.

Jung Eun-woo, who watched this, said, "I originally had a line review and fun of the Master, but I put down a line review." Jung Eun-woo felt intensely as he was Feelings Feelings, which seemed to be without Moral and fun.

Even when the members confided in their failure experiences, no serious commitment was achieved; even when they made a serious confession, they were cut off by the talk of Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, and the atmosphere was broken. When Yang Se-hyeong pointed out Tak Jae-hun's intervention, Lee Sang-min went over and Prayer with a futile excuse: "There's no one to say when we go home."

It was ironic to put up a Tak Jae-hun and Lee Sang-min, who had been punished for illegal gambling, as Masters, but the content was even more disappointing. If it was called "Master of Failure", at least a deep conversation about failure could be achieved. Feelings, which seemed to have invited guests from any entertainment program, not All The Butlers', were thick. I want to ask why the Master gave Moral down, like Jung Eun-woo.

All The Butlers' was a program that gave impressions and teachings, not just laughter. That's why All The Butlers' could be differentiated between entertainment programs filled with games and puns. But now All The Butlers' is no different from any other entertainment program. Tak Jae-hun, who is good at talking, has only drawn a smile of any entertainment by inviting Lee Sang-min, who has a lot of kyle. The touching Kahaani, which the members have drawn so far, evaporated in an instant.

Of course, I understand that I tried to change the atmosphere to the first large project after replacing All The Butlers' main PD. But such changes also had to be made in line with the viewer's eye level. I had to concentrate on why viewers watched All The Butlers' and why All The Butlers' was loved. If so, would not there be a misfortune of the present that puts down Moral and follows laughter? I hope that All The Butlers' will not lose its unique discriminant point in pursuit of a fresh reversal.