Park Soo-hong admits paternity atrocities "8 death insurance"

Broadcaster Park Soo-hong acknowledged that his brother-in-law and his wife had eight death insurance policies in the name of Park Soo-hong, and also accepted that the flammer (a malicious commenter) was his brother-in-laws best friend.On the 19th, Park Soo-hongs legal representative, Es Nong-eon Lawyer, said through a number of media including the Korea Daily, The coverage of insurance and flamers is true.In the case of insurance premiums in front of Park Soo-hong, 510 million won for disease death and 610 million won for injury death are guaranteed, but the maximum amount of receipt is 610 million won because disease death and injury death are incompatible.Also, about the identity of the flamer, flamer is the best friend of his brother.The police recently decided to dismiss the first distributor who wrote a bad story about the client (Park Soo-hong), but the objection was accepted and the prosecution is in the process of re-Susa.The reason why we received the decision to dismiss Flamer even though the contents of Flamer were found to be false is because he stated that the story he heard from his brother-in-law was true and posted it, the lawyer added.According to the current law, defamation is established only if it is aware that it is a false fact and has a purpose to slander the other party.Meanwhile, Park Soo-hong is working in court by criminally suing his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law to the prosecution for alleged violation of the Severe Economic Crime Punishment Act, saying he suffered financial damage of 11 billion won from his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law in April last year.Recently, Park Soo-hong has been found to be in the process of serving the Organic Animal Protection Center, led by a non-profit organization, a veterinary society without borders.

Broadcaster Park Soo-hong acknowledged that his brother-in-law and his wife had eight death insurance policies in the name of Park Soo-hong, and also accepted that the flammer (a malicious commenter) was his brother-in-law's best friend.

On the 19th, Park Soo-hong's legal representative, Es Nong-eon Lawyer, said through a number of media including the Korea Daily, "The coverage of insurance and flamers is true."

In the case of insurance premiums in front of Park Soo-hong, 510 million won for disease death and 610 million won for injury death are guaranteed, but the maximum amount of receipt is 610 million won because disease death and injury death are incompatible.

Also, about the identity of the flamer, "flamer is the best friend of his brother." The police recently decided to dismiss the first distributor who wrote a bad story about the client (Park Soo-hong), but the objection was accepted and the prosecution is in the process of re-Susa. "The reason why we received the decision to dismiss flamer even though the contents of flamer were found to be false is because he stated that the story he heard from his brother-in-law was true and posted it," the Lawyer added. According to the current law, defamation is established only if it is 'aware' that it is a false fact and has a 'purpose' to slander the other party.

Meanwhile, Park Soo-hong is working in court by criminally suing his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law to the prosecution for alleged violation of the Severe Economic Crime Punishment Act, saying he suffered financial damage of 11 billion won from his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law in April last year.

Recently, Park Soo-hong has been found to be in the process of serving the Organic Animal Protection Center, led by a non-profit organization, a veterinary society without borders.