The director's explanation is full of questions, and the homework that 'Snowdrop' should solve

on
After leaving the first broadcast James Stewart, director Cho Hyun-tak of Snowdrop explained the history distribution and the controversy over the beautification of the Ministry of Justice.However, there is still a wretched part, so we can not completely erase our concerns.The expectation of viewers for JTBCs new Saturday Drama snowdrop fortified snowdrop (played by Yoo Yun Mee and director Cho Hyun-tak, hereinafter Snowdrop) was significant from the YG Entertainment stage.This is because Yoo Hyun Mee and Cho Hyun-tak of SKY Castle, which set a record of 23.8% of the highest audience rating (based on Nielsen Korea pay-TV households), have once again coincided in three years.Jung Hae-in and BLACKPINK JiSoo, who became very popular as D.P. as the main actor, joined and added heat.But in March, some of the Synopsys of Snowdrop leaked and public opinion flipped.According to the plot, when tear gas exploded like fireworks in 1987, a female student thinks that a man who jumped into a dormitory in a female college is an activist student.It turns out that men were armed The Spies, and he fell in love with a woman who saved himself in a situation where he had to complete the mission his country had entrusted.When Synopsys was released, Snowdrop was immediately on the cusp.5 and 18 Democracy movements of China have room for distortion interpretation as if it were influenced by the North.In addition, the suspicion of the Spies was raised in that the male protagonist was the Nampa The Spies.The netizens point out that Snowdrop is a historical distribution, and they should stop shooting Snowdrop on the bulletin board of Cheong Wa Dae.I am trying to make a history distribution under the excuse of setting up. In a light controversy, JTBC disclosed some of its direct settings and clarified them.JTBC said: Snowdrop is not a drama that denigrates the democratization movement and glorifies An Gi-bu and The Spies; its not even dealing with the democratization movement.The current controversy is that some of the unfinished Synopsys have been leaked to Online, which has denied the allegations, saying the content of the controversy is different from what Snowdrop contains.In addition, JTBC explained that Drama has a character that was unfairly suppressed by the Spies under the military regime of the 80s, and Suho, who was in charge of Jeong Hae-in, was a victim of the era, not the South Korean The Spies.Even in the explanation, the reaction of the netizens was still cold.The fact that the Democracy Movements of China is not mentioned in the background of 1987 is not in line with it.In addition, the introduction of the person still frowned on the explanation that seemed to beautify the staff of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs who manipulated The Spies due to the Camellia forest incident.In the end, the controversy continued to the production presentation ahead of James Stewart. What do you think about the recent suspicions?I was asked if I was sure that this controversy would not happen again. Joe, who heard this, worried for a while and said, I think I should explain the work about Snowdrop first.Cho explained that Snowdrop has nothing to do with the democratization movement, as JTBC announced earlier.It is based on 1987, but all the settings except for the presidential election and the military regime of the time are virtual creations, he said. It was created to make the sad love story of Suho (Jeong Hae-in) and Jisoo stand out, but there is no other purpose.In the early days, some phrases were leaked out, and it became a combination of their own, and many words that were difficult to accept spread, and those things became a fact and articles.Im going to tell you that I and the writer are working on a work with a great sense of responsibility and mission, and I dont think there are any things youd be worried about.I would like you to watch the broadcast and check it. As such, JTBC and Cho Hyun-tak have opened their mouths to the controversy, but there are still many parts that have not been dismissed as controversial under the word creative.In particular, Joes answer to the question of YG Entertainment intention made everyone wonder.The writer said that in 2008, he saw the North Korean defectors handwriting at the political prison camp and recalled inspiration.Starting with the handwriting of the North Korean defectors, there is a mention of North Korea, but I hope you will not look at it politically and ideologically.I tried to look deeply and densely at people rather than focusing on North Korea. In fact, the entry of North Korea into the movement is a concern of history distribution, so the netizens are already voicing their worried voices.As he said, Please see and confirm the broadcast directly, it is noteworthy whether Snowdrop will be able to wash away the stigma of History Distortion Drama through his workability.

After leaving the first broadcast James Stewart, director Cho Hyun-tak of 'Snowdrop' explained the history distribution and the controversy over the beautification of the Ministry of Justice. However, there is still a wretched part, so we can not completely erase our concerns.

The expectation of viewers for JTBC's new Saturday Drama 'Snowdrop fortified Snowdrop' (played by Yoo Yun Mee and director Cho Hyun-tak, hereinafter 'Snowdrop') was significant from the YG Entertainment stage. This is because Yoo Hyun Mee and Cho Hyun-tak of 'SKY Castle', which set a record of 23.8% of the highest audience rating (based on Nielsen Korea pay-TV households), have once again coincided in three years. Jung Hae-in and BLACKPINK JiSoo, who became very popular as 'D.P.' as the main Actor, joined and added heat.

But in March, some of the Synopsys of Snowdrop leaked and public opinion flipped. According to the plot, when tear gas exploded like fireworks in 1987, a female student thinks that a man who jumped into a dormitory in a female college is an activist student. It turns out that men were armed The Spies, and he fell in love with a woman who saved himself in a situation where he had to complete the mission his country had entrusted.

When Synopsys was released, "Snowdrop" was immediately on the cusp. 5 and 18 Democracy movements of China have room for Distortion interpretation as if it were influenced by the North. In addition, the suspicion of The Spies was raised in that the male protagonist was the Nampa The Spies. The netizens point out that 'Snowdrop' is a historical distribution, and they should stop shooting 'Snowdrop' on the bulletin board of Cheong Wa Dae. I am trying to make a history distribution under the excuse of setting up. "

In a light controversy, JTBC disclosed some of its direct settings and clarified them. JTBC said: "'Snowdrop' is not a Drama that denigrates the democratization movement and glorifies An Gi-bu and The Spies; it's not even dealing with the democratization movement. The current controversy is that some of the unfinished Synopsys have been leaked to Online, which has denied the allegations, saying the content of the controversy is different from what Snowdrop contains. In addition, JTBC explained that "Drama has a character that was unfairly suppressed by The Spies under the military regime of the 80s," and Suho, who was in charge of Jeong Hae-in, was a victim of the era, not the South Korean The Spies.

Even in the explanation, the reaction of the netizens was still cold. The fact that the Democracy movements of China is not mentioned in the background of 1987 is not in line with it. In addition, the introduction of the person still frowned on the explanation that seemed to beautify the staff of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs who manipulated The Spies due to the Camellia forest incident. In the end, the controversy continued to the production presentation ahead of James Stewart. "What do you think about the recent suspicions? I was asked if I was sure that this controversy would not happen again. " Joe, who heard this, worried for a while and said, "I think I should explain the work about 'Snowdrop' first."

Cho explained that 'Snowdrop' has nothing to do with the democratization movement, as JTBC announced earlier. "It is based on 1987, but all the settings except for the presidential election and the military regime of the time are virtual creations," he said. "It was created to make the sad love story of Suho (Jeong Hae-in) and JiSoo stand out, but there is no other purpose."

"In the early days, some phrases were leaked out, and it became a combination of their own, and many words that were difficult to accept spread, and those things became a fact and articles. I’m going to tell you that I and the writer are working on a work with a great sense of responsibility and mission, and I don’t think there are any things you’d be worried about. I would like you to watch the broadcast and check it. "

As such, JTBC and Cho Hyun-tak have opened their mouths to the controversy, but there are still many parts that have not been dismissed as controversial under the word "creative". In particular, Joe's answer to the question of YG Entertainment intention made everyone wonder. "The writer said that in 2008, he saw the North Korean defectors' handwriting at the political prison camp and recalled inspiration. Starting with the handwriting of the North Korean defectors, there is a mention of North Korea, but I hope you will not look at it politically and ideologically. I tried to look deeply and densely at people rather than focusing on North Korea. " In fact, the entry of North Korea into the movement is a concern of history distribution, so the netizens are already voicing their worried voices. As he said, "Please see and confirm the broadcast directly," it is noteworthy whether Snowdrop will be able to wash away the stigma of 'History Distortion Drama' through his workability.