While Drama 'Snowdrop: Snowdrop' is on the rise every day due to controversy over history distribution and democratization, it is a pity that the breathtaking tightrope walk with the name virtual is a pity.
"There is no spy in 'Snowdrop' that leads the democratization movement. The setting of male and female protagonists participating in or leading the democratization movement did not appear in the last one or two times, and there is no place in the script afterwards. "The concern about the history distribution and democratization movement that many people have pointed out will be resolved in the future of the Drama development process," he said. "It contains the intention of the production team that the abnormal era in which individual freedom and happiness are suppressed by unfair power is not repeated." .
It was already the third official announcement, but the public anger is not cool. As the petition for the suspension of 'Snowdrop' has appeared, there is a disagreement about the freedom of creation among historians, broadcasting officials, and writers. It is not simply that all creations should be respected, but criticism is that the risk is the risk that the production team and the broadcasting company should endure, but the claim that it should not be abolished through censorship from the beginning of the broadcast, and that it should not be consumed lightly with the fatigue of the existence of many Victims.
However, apart from the controversy over freedom of creation, unlike the 'Snowdrop' side emphasizing "virtual story", there are devices that remind us of real people and events, and it can not be free from the controversy of history distribution and democratization. It presents a concrete background of 'South Korea' during the dictatorship in 1987, not just 'South Korea', but also the name 'Youngcho' (after the change)', such as a real democratization activist, or the male protagonist of a South Korean operative with a fake identity of a Korean-German, reminds me of the Camellia incident, It is doubtful that the production team is "a virtual person, a virtual background, in addition to the establishment of the military government Iran in 1987".
"In this background, the virtual story of the vested interests of the North Korea regime to maintain power" is also a concern that it will empower the claim to denigrate the democratization that there was a connection with North Korea. In addition, some fans are arguing that they are demeaning democratization to defend 'Snowdrop' or that they are already beautifying the Ministry of Public Safety and Security, and the public is worried that they can give misinformation to overseas fans who will be exposed to Korean modern and contemporary history through 'Snowdrop'.
It requires more delicacy to bring history into content under the 'virtual' Iran name. Recently, 'Chosun Gummasa' and 'Iron Wang Hu', which were on the board due to the controversy of history distribution, were also works with fiction, but they had to be abolished after attracting real people. Even if there is no Chinese capital issue, history Distortion and intention to undermine, 'Snowdrop' continues to walk a tightrope with 'real' unlike 'virtual' Iran explanation. It emphasizes Misunderstood as an excessive assumption, but it will not be able to avoid responsibility that made the real and virtual boundaries unclear.