"It's not even The Spies and sex offender?"..Yoo Seung-jun, Avoidance of military service, but Imine

on
On the afternoon of the 26th, the 5th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Jung-kyu Jung) held the second hearing date of the Request for Cancellation of Dismissal of Passport Issues filed by Yoo Seung-jun against Los Angeles (LA) Consulate General of the United States, Hong, asking him to issue Korea Entrance Dussehra.Earlier, Yoo Seung-jun avoided military service by acquiring United States of America citizenship ahead of his enlistment in 2002.Yoo Seung-jun, who has limited Korean Entrance, requested Entrance as an overseas Korean Entrance Dussehra.However, the Korean government did not accept the issuance of the Dussehra of Yoo Seung-jun and the Yoo Seung-jun filed its first lawsuit in 2015.Yoo Seung-jun, who received the final winner Judgment in March last year, applied for the issuance of Dussehra of overseas Koreans (F-4) to the Los Angeles Consulate General of the United States, Hong, but was rejected.The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, South Korea can be a hindrance to safety, order maintenance and public welfare.Yoo Seung-jun filed a second administrative lawsuit last October.In the first hearing on June 3, Yoo Seung-jun and Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong, debated the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment interpretation of the first lawsuit before the trial.Yoo Seung-jun, the deputy, claimed that Judgment, the winner of the Supreme Court of South Korea, was intended to allow the issuance of Dussehra.On the other hand, LAConsultate General of the United States, Hong, refuted, It was only the intention to decide whether to issue Dussehra again by exercising discretion.The Yoo Seung-jun agent asked the Supreme Court of South Korea to ask for a fact-finding inquiry about what conclusions it had made at the time, and the court accepted.However, the court emphasized to the Yoo Seung-jun side, The freedom of Korea Entrance to overseas Koreans can not be regarded as freedom of basic rights in the Constitution, but make it clear how to see it.On the second day of the defense, the two sides, who held their existing position, continued to fight tight.First, Yoo Seung-jun insisted that the refusal of the Dussehra issuance of the United States, Hong, is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court of South Korea.Yoo Seung-juns suspicion of military service makes military service obligors feel deprived, and the remarks on YouTube are controversial. YouTube video is after the last disposition.I think that the feelings of the people are also an emotion of a specific people and an abstract logic, he said. It is not so grounded to give legitimacy to the no entry based on the video.We have made more than five years of effort in this lawsuit alone, and we have received the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment, but the results are the same as the first.In particular, You Young-juns acquisition of United States of America nationality was not a military evasion but an Imine choice to stay with family.I would like to ask if Yoo Seung-jun is in the same position as the Spies, drug offenders, sex friends, etc., he said.Yoo Seung-jun interprets that the Judgment of the Supreme Court of South Korea is intended to issue a visa, which is an excessive claim, said the Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong.Yoo Seung-jun left for overseas performances in 2002 when he received a notice of entry and acquired United States of America citizenship in the process.This is the only case and special situation related to the Avoidance of Military Service. Nevertheless, Yoo Seung-jun has caused controversy by telling several stories on YouTube even after the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment.In addition, the issuance of visas restricts judicial judgment and comprehensively recognizes discretionary rights for administrative dispositions.Military service avoidance is a subjective area, so we have to judge and conclude everything. Meanwhile, the next date is scheduled for November 4.Photo = DB
On the afternoon of the 26th, the 5th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Jung-kyu Jung) held the second hearing date of the Request for Cancellation of Dismissal of Passport Issues filed by Yoo Seung-jun against Los Angeles (LA) Consulate General of the United States, Hong, asking him to issue Korea Entrance Dussehra.Earlier, Yoo Seung-jun avoided military service by acquiring United States of America citizenship ahead of his enlistment in 2002.Yoo Seung-jun, who has limited Korean Entrance, requested Entrance as an overseas Korean Entrance Dussehra.However, the Korean government did not accept the issuance of the Dussehra of Yoo Seung-jun and the Yoo Seung-jun filed its first lawsuit in 2015.Yoo Seung-jun, who received the final winner Judgment in March last year, applied for the issuance of Dussehra of overseas Koreans (F-4) to the Los Angeles Consulate General of the United States, Hong, but was rejected.The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, South Korea can be a hindrance to safety, order maintenance and public welfare.Yoo Seung-jun filed a second administrative lawsuit last October.In the first hearing on June 3, Yoo Seung-jun and Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong, debated the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment interpretation of the first lawsuit before the trial.Yoo Seung-jun, the deputy, claimed that Judgment, the winner of the Supreme Court of South Korea, was intended to allow the issuance of Dussehra.On the other hand, LAConsultate General of the United States, Hong, refuted, It was only the intention to decide whether to issue Dussehra again by exercising discretion.The Yoo Seung-jun agent asked the Supreme Court of South Korea to ask for a fact-finding inquiry about what conclusions it had made at the time, and the court accepted.However, the court emphasized to the Yoo Seung-jun side, The freedom of Korea Entrance to overseas Koreans can not be regarded as freedom of basic rights in the Constitution, but make it clear how to see it.On the second day of the defense, the two sides, who held their existing position, continued to fight tight.First, Yoo Seung-jun insisted that the refusal of the Dussehra issuance of the United States, Hong, is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court of South Korea.Yoo Seung-juns suspicion of military service makes military service obligors feel deprived, and the remarks on YouTube are controversial. YouTube video is after the last disposition.I think that the feelings of the people are also an emotion of a specific people and an abstract logic, he said. It is not so grounded to give legitimacy to the no entry based on the video.We have made more than five years of effort in this lawsuit alone, and we have received the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment, but the results are the same as the first.In particular, You Young-juns acquisition of United States of America nationality was not a military evasion but an Imine choice to stay with family.I would like to ask if Yoo Seung-jun is in the same position as the Spies, drug offenders, sex friends, etc., he said.Yoo Seung-jun interprets that the Judgment of the Supreme Court of South Korea is intended to issue a visa, which is an excessive claim, said the Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong.Yoo Seung-jun left for overseas performances in 2002 when he received a notice of entry and acquired United States of America citizenship in the process.This is the only case and special situation related to the Avoidance of Military Service. Nevertheless, Yoo Seung-jun has caused controversy by telling several stories on YouTube even after the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment.In addition, the issuance of visas restricts judicial judgment and comprehensively recognizes discretionary rights for administrative dispositions.Military service avoidance is a subjective area, so we have to judge and conclude everything. Meanwhile, the next date is scheduled for November 4.Photo = DB

On the afternoon of the 26th, the 5th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Jung-kyu Jung) held the second hearing date of the "Request for Cancellation of Dismissal of Passport Issues" filed by Yoo Seung-jun against Los Angeles (LA) Consulate General of the United States, Hong, asking him to issue Korea Entrance Dussehra.

Earlier, Yoo Seung-jun avoided military service by acquiring United States of America citizenship ahead of his enlistment in 2002. Yoo Seung-jun, who has limited Korean Entrance, requested Entrance as an overseas Korean Entrance Dussehra. However, the Korean government did not accept the issuance of the Dussehra of Yoo Seung-jun and the Yoo Seung-jun filed its first lawsuit in 2015.

Yoo Seung-jun, who received the final winner Judgment in March last year, applied for the issuance of Dussehra of overseas Koreans (F-4) to the Los Angeles Consulate General of the United States, Hong, but was rejected. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, "South Korea can be a hindrance to safety, order maintenance and public welfare." Yoo Seung-jun filed a second administrative lawsuit last October.

In the first hearing on June 3, Yoo Seung-jun and Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong, debated the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment interpretation of the first lawsuit before the trial.

Yoo Seung-jun, the deputy, claimed that Judgment, the winner of the Supreme Court of South Korea, "was intended to allow the issuance of Dussehra." On the other hand, LAConsultate General of the United States, Hong, refuted, "It was only the intention to decide whether to issue Dussehra again by exercising discretion." The Yoo Seung-jun agent asked the Supreme Court of South Korea to ask for a fact-finding inquiry about what conclusions it had made at the time, and the court accepted. However, the court emphasized to the Yoo Seung-jun side, "The freedom of Korea Entrance to overseas Koreans can not be regarded as freedom of basic rights in the Constitution, but make it clear how to see it."

On the second day of the defense, the two sides, who held their existing position, continued to fight tight.

First, Yoo Seung-jun insisted that "the refusal of the Dussehra issuance of the United States, Hong, is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court of South Korea." "Yoo Seung-jun's suspicion of military service makes military service obligors feel deprived, and the remarks on YouTube are controversial. YouTube video is after the last disposition. "I think that the feelings of the people are also an emotion of a specific people and an abstract logic," he said. "It is not so grounded to give legitimacy to the no entry based on the video."

"We have made more than five years of effort in this lawsuit alone, and we have received the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment, but the results are the same as the first." In particular, "You Young-jun's acquisition of United States of America nationality was not a military evasion but an Imine choice to stay with family. "I would like to ask if Yoo Seung-jun is in the same position as The Spies, drug offenders, sex friends, etc.," he said.

"Yoo Seung-jun interprets that the Judgment of the Supreme Court of South Korea is intended to issue a visa, which is an excessive claim," said the Los Angeles Consultate General of the United States, Hong. "Yoo Seung-jun left for overseas performances in 2002 when he received a notice of entry and acquired United States of America citizenship in the process. This is the only case and special situation related to the Avoidance of military service. "

"Nevertheless, Yoo Seung-jun has caused controversy by telling several stories on YouTube even after the Supreme Court of South Korea Judgment. In addition, the issuance of visas restricts judicial Judgment and comprehensively recognizes discretionary rights for administrative dispositions. Military service avoidance is a subjective area, so we have to judge and conclude everything. "

Meanwhile, the next date is scheduled for November 4.

Photo = DB