SBS entertainment <All The Butlers> invited foreign guests to 'Covid19' and had time to debate. However, the attempt to solve the theme of Eye movement descendization and reprocessing through entertainment at the time of Eye movement descendization and reprocessing left an uncomfortable backbone for both performers and viewers at the same time.
In SBS <All The Butlers> broadcasted on the 30th, a youth group from World countries appeared to share a debate on World issues. It brought the concept of the foreign debate program "Non Summit", which was broadcasted on JTBC in the past and became very popular. In fact, many of the guests who appeared on this day were from fixed panels of Non Summit, including Alberto Fujimori (Itally), Tyler (US), Robin (France), Lucky (India), Blair (Australia, and Video).
Members of the District Youth Association shared a heated debate on the status of Covid in each country, introducing whether Covid could end this year. Covid is a common issue in the whole World, but the problem is that there are many examples of Eye movement designization and reprocessing because the political situation and interests of each country are intertwined, so that the panels who are not experts mention.
It was 'China responsibility' that became a hot potato in the debate on this day. Ma Guk-jin, who participated in the China panel, claimed that "China Covid new infection is zero," and claimed that China was able to succeed in the prevention of Covid because it was rock-down more than imagined in the early days. However, Alberto Fujimori and Robin questioned the credibility of China's statistical announcement, citing cases of Italy and France.
Tyler said, "There is no conspiracy theory because there is not enough cooperation in sharing information about Covid19. "We had to make sure that the China government was clearly identified," Ma Guk-jin refuted, "the door-opening investigation was conducted; experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) also participated." When Robin asked, "Do you think China has been transparent about Covid19?", Ma Guk-jin said, "It opened transparently in the early days of World as well as in Korea. I think that the perspective of accepting is only different. "
Tyler also pointed out that China is a toxic Eye movement descension and reprocessing part. "WHO is an international organization, and there is no right to enter any Europe and collect information (with force). The Europe's cooperation is needed, which is not easy in China, which is a 'many-controlled communist state system'. That's why I think (China) would not have been cooperative," he said.
"I think the WHO has seen a lot of China in the four to five months since the beginning of the Covid19," Lucky said. "India media think that if the WHO declared an emergency early on in the early days of Covid, Why did not WHO say anything? " When Makukjin insisted, "It was really okay in the beginning," Lucky pointed out that "this is a problem" and raised his voice.
The audience’s reactions were mixed after the show went out, and the latter half of the debate was actually a composition of the former World panels against the Covid issue. The claim of the Magukjin is perhaps natural, but it has not been different from the official position of the China government. The criticism that China is responsible for the pre-World spread of Covid19 is a topic that is still being raised in the current World in many Europe. It was also a story that could not help but feel Eye movement descendization and reprocessing from the standpoint of Koreans who are suffering from Covid19.
On the other hand, there is a position that we should understand the position of Ma Guk-jin. China is Europe, where individual free expression is not guaranteed. Individuals or businesses are often disadvantaged by the fact that they have made statements that are contrary to or intrusive to the government's policy. It may have been impossible in the first place to have one individual come on the air and raise critical opinions on the most Eye movement descendization and reprocessing issues in the country.
Since the recent Sad issue and the Han Han-ryeong controversy, the mention of China in the Korean entertainment industry has long been a Taboo. Some Chinese media and netizens are trying to interfere with the freedom of expression of other entertainers, such as BTS' 6 and 25 mentions or Lee Hyo-ri's jokes in the entertainment industry. The subject of Covid19, which can not be mentioned except for the China issue, was touched by what was considered an implicit Taboo.
As long as I took out the theme of Eye movement descendization and reprocessing, I should have accepted that this situation would happen from the beginning. The regrettable part is that there was no voice to represent the universal perspective of Koreans or their own analysis. While the foreign panels continued their heated debate, the Korean fixed members of All The Butlers did not actively intervene, but only listened passively or reminded the atmosphere with a light joke.
Without Tyler's logical problem and Lucky's stone straight line, the debate of the day would have ended in a sweet potato-like shape that would not have been done.
Moreover, next week, <All The Butlers> predicted that it would debate on the theme of 'Myanmar incident'. Coincidentally, the Myanmar incident is also being discussed as having influenced China's coup d'état directly or indirectly. However, it is unclear whether this part will be mentioned in the debate. The sudden “debate experiment” of All The Butlers, which is at the center of the controversy, is it a fresh challenge or a hasty overdrive?
