When a problem occurs, there is a magical expression that stops discussing the problem and avoids responsibility: “It was not meant to be.” But this expression has many weaknesses. Not only does not mean that there is no intention, but it also reveals the laziness of inertial thinking that does not understand how your intentions will be accepted.
“I didn’t mean to,” said a recent “lapper Minty.” Minty introduced herself as a 2002 student and released a video of Mnet’s “High Rapper 2” support. However, it was pointed out that the video at the time stimulated the false sexual fantasy toward a minor woman. It was because of the T-shirt with the phrase Eat Me (EAT ME), the short bottom, the posture that emphasized the legs, and the lyrics of the self-titled wrap You Du (YOU DO) released in this video. In this song, Minty claims that "My sister is not a lolita but a sexy concept." The later "Candy Claudy" is an explicit suggestion of sexual intercourse.
At that time, there was a controversy over Minty and Minty's songs, and recently it was revealed that Minty was 28 years old, not teenagers, and criticism against him became even hotter. It is pointed out that minors are sexually targeted and commercialized these Content. “To tell you about the Lolita controversy, I never aimed at (the Lolita concept),” Minty said on YouTube on the 9th. “(‘Yu-du’) I thought of it as a gag video when I posted the rap video, but I didn’t think it seriously. It is argued that the Lolita at the time was so antipathy that I kept that style after that. "
But just because Minty didn't want the Lolita concept, in other words, that she didn't intend to sexually target teenagers, doesn't mean the harmfulness of Content disappears. He admits his insensitive gender sensitivity, which he does not know how his intentions will be accepted. Minty said he reflected on his past Content. “I saw it again about a year later, and it was definitely bizarre and ugly. I shouldn’t have gone that way when others said it was wrong, but I’m very embarrassed and regrettable.” He just wanted to learn something from his own fault.
Let’s take another example of “Not that Intention” being used. sbs's Running Man production team was embrYu Yu Hakushoed in controversy on June 2 that it had captioned the scene of actor Jeon So-min coughing, Taking a Throwing Up and Throwing Up, and then made a comic of the late Park Jong-cheol's death of torture. “I wrote it as a satire about the recording at the time, and I have no intention of any related incident.” I don’t know. To gain persuasive power, it should be proved that the production team who wrote the subtitles in question did not know the police's remarks at the time that they were forced to die and died. Could there be a subtitle called 'Tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-t
The worse thing was the apology of the “Running Man” crew, who said at the time, “If there were people who would have been uncomfortable, I would try to make it more careful in the future.” It is an apology that cleverly reduces their mistakes. It is not an apology if there are people who are uncomfortable, but an apology that is sorry for inconvenience. The inconvenience given by the caption, 'Tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak-tak- Moreover, sbs has been controversial since it has been expressed several times before.
There is no magical expression in the apology, just the right apology that identifies your faults and accurately lists how you will improve these mistakes in the future. The apology that explains that it was not just "that intention" without reflection and improvement is empty.
"I didn't mean to."