Spin-off UnAuthorized Exposure ... Law, MBC and Kim Tae-ho PD 5 million won compensation judgment

on
In MBC Hangout with Yoo, the court ruled that Exposure of Spin-off without the authors consent was a violation of Copyright.According to legal circles on the 22nd, the Civil Affairs Agreement Department 62 (Senior Judge Lee Young-kwang) at the Seoul Central District Court ruled partially in favor of Graffiti Author Shim Chan-yang in a lawsuit against MBC and PD Kim Tae-ho, saying, The defendant should pay 5 million won to the plaintiff together.MBC had Hangout with Yoo remove the part of Sim Authors Spin-off that was Exposed, otherwise it would not be broadcast.MBC and Kim Tae-ho PD insisted that Spin-off was incidentally included in the appearance person shooting process and not Copyright infringement.However, the court ruled that the importance of the work used as the background of the stage of the stage is not low and the amount of exposure is not small, so the importance of the program is not considered to be minor.In 2020, Hangout with Yoo took a gallery cafe in Seoul and filmed the process of forming Yoo Jae-Suk, Lee Hyo-ri,Sim Authors large graffiti Spin-off was displayed in the cafe, which was exposed on the air for about 3 minutes and 30 seconds, but Sim Authors name was not displayed in the process and there was no prior permission.In the end, it became a civil lawsuit.The problematic footage was broadcast 44 times and 45 times, and it was uploaded to other platforms such as YouTube.
In MBC Hangout with Yoo, the court ruled that Exposure of Spin-off without the authors consent was a violation of Copyright.According to legal circles on the 22nd, the Civil Affairs Agreement Department 62 (Senior Judge Lee Young-kwang) at the Seoul Central District Court ruled partially in favor of Graffiti Author Shim Chan-yang in a lawsuit against MBC and PD Kim Tae-ho, saying, The defendant should pay 5 million won to the plaintiff together.MBC had Hangout with Yoo remove the part of Sim Authors Spin-off that was Exposed, otherwise it would not be broadcast.MBC and Kim Tae-ho PD insisted that Spin-off was incidentally included in the appearance person shooting process and not Copyright infringement.However, the court ruled that the importance of the work used as the background of the stage of the stage is not low and the amount of exposure is not small, so the importance of the program is not considered to be minor.In 2020, Hangout with Yoo took a gallery cafe in Seoul and filmed the process of forming Yoo Jae-Suk, Lee Hyo-ri,Sim Authors large graffiti Spin-off was displayed in the cafe, which was exposed on the air for about 3 minutes and 30 seconds, but Sim Authors name was not displayed in the process and there was no prior permission.In the end, it became a civil lawsuit.The problematic footage was broadcast 44 times and 45 times, and it was uploaded to other platforms such as YouTube.

In MBC Hangout with Yoo', the court ruled that Exposure of Spin-off without the Author's consent was a violation of Copyright. According to legal circles on the 22nd, the Civil Affairs Agreement Department 62 (Senior Judge Lee Young-kwang) at the Seoul Central District Court ruled partially in favor of Graffiti Author Shim Chan-yang in a lawsuit against MBC and PD Kim Tae-ho, saying, "The defendant should pay 5 million won to the plaintiff together." MBC had Hangout with Yoo' remove the part of Sim Author's Spin-off that was Exposed, otherwise it would not be broadcast. MBC and Kim Tae-ho PD insisted that Spin-off was incidentally included in the appearance person shooting process and not Copyright infringement. However, the court ruled that the importance of the work used as the background of the stage of the stage is not low and the amount of Exposure is not small, so the importance of the program is not considered to be minor. In 2020, Hangout with Yoo' took a gallery cafe in Seoul and filmed the process of forming Yoo Jae-Suk, Lee Hyo-ri, Sim Author's large graffiti Spin-off was displayed in the cafe, which was exposed on the air for about 3 minutes and 30 seconds, but Sim Author's name was not displayed in the process and there was no prior permission. In the end, it became a civil lawsuit. The problematic footage was broadcast 44 times and 45 times, and it was uploaded to other platforms such as YouTube.