"Park Soo-hong, crazy about women"... ⁇ , tax accountant's conciliatory ⁇ "6th trial" filled with private life revelations

on
It has been alleged that Brother Park, who was put on trial for seizure of TV broadcaster Park Soo-hong (53)s appearance fee and down payment, tried to cajole the tax accountant.Questions were also raised about the grounds for the rebuttal by Brothers side The Attorney, citing Park Soo-hongs privacy issues, and a question that was far from the contents of the trial.Parks trial was held on the 7th at the 11th hearing of the Seoul Western District Court Criminal Settlement. Taxpayers A, B, and Park Soo-hongs former manager C attended the trial as Innocent Witness.Mr. A and Mr. B have been working for Park Soo-hongs Rael and Media Boom for 10 years.Tax accountants A and B testified that Park intentionally tried to hide accounting data from Park Soo-hong. In particular, Mr. A said, In early 2020, Mr. Park called and said, Park Soo-hong is crazy about his girlfriend.I do not want to show you the accounting data, he said. I have only met Mr. Park for a while and I was so good that I did not doubt 1%. I really thought Park Soo-hong was crazy.I have had three meetings since then, but it was strange that there was a lot of disagreement with what Mr. Park said. Former manager C spoke about Park Soo-hongs usual payment habits, testimonial to whether Park Soo-hong was in an unknown situation regarding Brother Parks seizure.He also said that Park mostly took over related tasks.Parks first question was Does Park Soo-hong usually go to nightclubs often?In addition, Park Soo-hong asked a question about how to pay at a nightclub, and a question mark was raised because Innocent Witness asked for the wrong reason.Currently, Park runs two entertainment agencies for about 10 years and is charged with seizure of 6.2 billion won including Park Soo-hongs performance fee (seizure under the specific economic crime punishment law).Prosecutors believe that Park illegally siphoned 1.17 billion won from 2011 to 2021 for the purpose of purchasing real estate, 90 million won for unauthorized use of other funds, 90 million won for credit card use by agencies, 2.9 billion won for unauthorized withdrawal of personal accounts of plaintiffs, and 1.9 billion won for the method of remittance of salaries using H ⁇ Wi employee registration.Mr. Park acknowledged some charges. However, most of the charges, such as the use of corporate cards and the payment of employee salaries for H ⁇ Wi, are denied.The trial was the sixth trial of the Brother seizure charge.There is also a criticism that Park Soo-hongs private life was scratched as a basis for refuting the seizure charges.Park Soo-hong, Kim Dae-ye Couples lawyer, The Attorney, said, Brother seems to be emotionally dealing with the case now, after watching the trial.The Attorney usually acts to reflect the needs of the client, he said. The attitude of the opposition Newspaper and the attitude in the question reveals an emotional situation.
It has been alleged that Brother Park, who was put on trial for seizure of TV broadcaster Park Soo-hong (53)s appearance fee and down payment, tried to cajole the tax accountant.Questions were also raised about the grounds for the rebuttal by Brothers side The Attorney, citing Park Soo-hongs privacy issues, and a question that was far from the contents of the trial.Parks trial was held on the 7th at the 11th hearing of the Seoul Western District Court Criminal Settlement. Taxpayers A, B, and Park Soo-hongs former manager C attended the trial as Innocent Witness.Mr. A and Mr. B have been working for Park Soo-hongs Rael and Media Boom for 10 years.Tax accountants A and B testified that Park intentionally tried to hide accounting data from Park Soo-hong. In particular, Mr. A said, In early 2020, Mr. Park called and said, Park Soo-hong is crazy about his girlfriend.I do not want to show you the accounting data, he said. I have only met Mr. Park for a while and I was so good that I did not doubt 1%. I really thought Park Soo-hong was crazy.I have had three meetings since then, but it was strange that there was a lot of disagreement with what Mr. Park said. Former manager C spoke about Park Soo-hongs usual payment habits, testimonial to whether Park Soo-hong was in an unknown situation regarding Brother Parks seizure.He also said that Park mostly took over related tasks.Parks first question was Does Park Soo-hong usually go to nightclubs often?In addition, Park Soo-hong asked a question about how to pay at a nightclub, and a question mark was raised because Innocent Witness asked for the wrong reason.Currently, Park runs two entertainment agencies for about 10 years and is charged with seizure of 6.2 billion won including Park Soo-hongs performance fee (seizure under the specific economic crime punishment law).Prosecutors believe that Park illegally siphoned 1.17 billion won from 2011 to 2021 for the purpose of purchasing real estate, 90 million won for unauthorized use of other funds, 90 million won for credit card use by agencies, 2.9 billion won for unauthorized withdrawal of personal accounts of plaintiffs, and 1.9 billion won for the method of remittance of salaries using H ⁇ Wi employee registration.Mr. Park acknowledged some charges. However, most of the charges, such as the use of corporate cards and the payment of employee salaries for H ⁇ Wi, are denied.The trial was the sixth trial of the Brother seizure charge.There is also a criticism that Park Soo-hongs private life was scratched as a basis for refuting the seizure charges.Park Soo-hong, Kim Dae-ye Couples lawyer, The Attorney, said, Brother seems to be emotionally dealing with the case now, after watching the trial.The Attorney usually acts to reflect the needs of the client, he said. The attitude of the opposition Newspaper and the attitude in the question reveals an emotional situation.

It has been alleged that Brother Park, who was put on trial for seizure of TV broadcaster Park Soo-hong (53)'s appearance fee and down payment, tried to cajole the tax accountant. Questions were also raised about the grounds for the rebuttal by Brother's side The Attorney, citing Park Soo-hong's privacy issues, and a Question that was far from the contents of the trial. Park's trial was held on the 7th at the 11th hearing of the Seoul Western District Court Criminal Settlement. Taxpayers A, B, and Park Soo-hong's former manager C attended the trial as Innocent Witness. Mr. A and Mr. B have been working for Park Soo-hong's "Rael" and "Media Boom" for 10 years. Tax accountants A and B testified that Park intentionally tried to hide accounting Data from Park Soo-hong. In particular, Mr. A said, "In early 2020, Mr. Park called and said, Park Soo-hong is crazy about his girlfriend. I do not want to show you the accounting Data, "he said." I have only met Mr. Park for a while and I was so good that I did not doubt 1%. I really thought Park Soo-hong was crazy. I have had three meetings since then, but it was strange that there was a lot of disagreement with what Mr. Park said. " Former manager C spoke about Park Soo-hong's usual payment habits, testimonial to whether Park Soo-hong was in an unknown situation regarding Brother Park's seizure. He also said that Park mostly took over related tasks. Park's first Question was "Does Park Soo-hong usually go to nightclubs often?" In addition, Park Soo-hong asked a Question about how to pay at a nightclub, and a Question mark was raised because Innocent Witness asked for the wrong reason. Currently, Park runs two entertainment agencies for about 10 years and is charged with seizure of 6.2 billion won including Park Soo-hong's performance fee (seizure under the specific economic crime punishment law). Prosecutors believe that Park illegally siphoned 1.17 billion won from 2011 to 2021 for the purpose of purchasing real estate, 90 million won for unauthorized use of other funds, 90 million won for credit card use by agencies, 2.9 billion won for unauthorized withdrawal of personal accounts of plaintiffs, and 1.9 billion won for the method of remittance of salaries using H ⁇ Wi employee registration. Mr. Park acknowledged some charges. However, most of the charges, such as the use of corporate cards and the payment of employee salaries for H ⁇ Wi, are denied. The trial was the sixth trial of the Brother seizure charge. There is also a criticism that Park Soo-hong's private life was scratched as a basis for refuting the seizure charges. Park Soo-hong, Kim Dae-ye Couple's lawyer, The Attorney, said, "Brother seems to be emotionally dealing with the case now," after watching the trial. "The Attorney usually acts to reflect the needs of the client," he said. "The attitude of the opposition Newspaper and the attitude in the Question reveals an emotional situation."