'10.42 million won for 4 years', a black rubber shoe writer who came to the world in a Contract made by Hugo

on
The creator of the character is light, and only the publisher and distributor platform pockets are heavy.There are many irrational incidents in the publishing industry in which the value of creation is not respected. Unfair Contracts, in which only the creator becomes a hukou (very dangerous situation or circumstances) are repeated, but it is rare to take issue.Because the law doesnt protect the creator.Writer Lee Woo-young, who created the character Black Rubber God on the 11th, has been suing the character agency Hyungseol Publishing Co. (hereinafter referred to as Hyungseol) for violating Copyright since 2018.Lee Woo-young was the one who was accused of violating Copyright.The Black Rubber Shoes serialized in Boy Champ from 1992 to 2006 is a comic cartoon depicting the stories of elementary school students, middle school students, and their families in the background of Seoul in the 1960s.Lee Woo-young and Lee Woo-jin painted and Lee Yeong-il wrote. At that time, the longest-running serial record was set and 45 books were published.I got a confirmation of the facts about the background of the black rubber shin dispute.In 1998, Black Rubber Shoe was reborn as Toei Animation by investing in KBS and Saehan Donghwas production of Song Jung-yul.Toei Animation Character, which is familiar to us, is not much different from the original character, although Song Jung-yul has slightly modified the original character to Toei Animation.Copyright of the Black Rubber Shoes comics was so popular that it was produced in 2000 (the second Black Rubber Shoes) and 2004 (the third Black Rubber Shoes).Since 2004, he has been publishing comics and has been in contact with Lee Yeong-il and the late Lee Woo-young.The publisher claims to have planned the plot and character of the black rubber shoe work, decided the direction of the work, and was deeply involved in the creation of the black rubber shoe work.The black rubber shoe was not an art work registered with the Copyright committee, so there was a limit to the protection of Copyright, and in consultation with the authors, the author was registered with the Copyright committee.When Lee Woo-young was in the military, his brother asked for his brothers share because his brother took the place of serialization. He accepted it and received 36% of the shares in black rubber shoes, Lee Yeong-il 27% Lee Woo Young 27% % And Lee Woo-jin became 10%.Toei Animation was included in the contract and paid the investment to activate the black rubber shoes. The black rubber shoes 4th Toei Animation ranked first in the audience rating and won many awards.The success of the black rubber shoes and the commercialization of the character were attributed to the investment and aggressive marketing of the company.The beginning of the dispute came when writer Lee Woo-young asked for the return of his stake in Black Rubber Shoes in 2018.Lee Woo-young writes that all contracts are invalid because he will do business directly with the company, and he sent proof of contents to KBS, Saehan fairy tale, and licensing companies.Lee Woo-young did not know and did not agree with the 4th Toei Animation, the contract was invalid, and the authors registration was wrong.He also argued that the contract was made and the original authors share was reduced too much.When creating Toei Animation, he added that only 3% of the original authors were allowed to go, and that even this was distributed according to the Character Copyright holding ratio.Lee Woo-young explains that the brother-in-law received 4.35 million won for four years until he made four black rubber shoes with KBS.According to the details of the contract payments submitted by the author, Lee Woo-young received 10.42 million won from the first quarter of 2014 to the first quarter of 2020.He also filed a civil lawsuit worth 100 million won, saying that Lee Woo-young had drawn comics elsewhere.Lee Woo-young said in an interview with a number of media, I have been in conflict since I asked for the correction of an unfair contract without a contract period, and I was finally accused.In addition, the movie Black Rubber Shin also added, I did not ask permission from the original author, and I have not paid a small amount of original fee.Lee Woo-young said, We are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a character agency for drawing a cartoon depicting a black rubber character without their permission. Why should the original author draw a cartoon with the permission of a character agency? I am confused about why I have to be tried, but I believe it will be resolved as it is. Although it is based on the black rubber shoes, the Toei Animation Character is a different one that revised and supplemented the original.He argues that Contract, which was made according to the practice at the time, can not be compared with the recent Contract Standard.It is quite difficult to understand that the settlement of the original character of the popular character is 10.42 million won. It may not have been a legal problem. However, the value of creation is that the creators efforts are not respected.The lawsuit over the black rubber shoes was caused by the comprehensive and exclusive transfer of Copyright owned by the creator in the name of business. The cartoon world sees it as an unfair contract.Baek Hee and the writer of Cloud Bread have also been sued and lost. It is law to protect creators in unfair situations. It seems urgent to improve the law to protect creators.
The creator of the character is light, and only the publisher and distributor platform pockets are heavy.There are many irrational incidents in the publishing industry in which the value of creation is not respected. Unfair Contracts, in which only the creator becomes a hukou (very dangerous situation or circumstances) are repeated, but it is rare to take issue.Because the law doesnt protect the creator.Writer Lee Woo-young, who created the character Black Rubber God on the 11th, has been suing the character agency Hyungseol Publishing Co. (hereinafter referred to as Hyungseol) for violating Copyright since 2018.Lee Woo-young was the one who was accused of violating Copyright.The Black Rubber Shoes serialized in Boy Champ from 1992 to 2006 is a comic cartoon depicting the stories of elementary school students, middle school students, and their families in the background of Seoul in the 1960s.Lee Woo-young and Lee Woo-jin painted and Lee Yeong-il wrote. At that time, the longest-running serial record was set and 45 books were published.I got a confirmation of the facts about the background of the black rubber shin dispute.In 1998, Black Rubber Shoe was reborn as Toei Animation by investing in KBS and Saehan Donghwas production of Song Jung-yul.Toei Animation Character, which is familiar to us, is not much different from the original character, although Song Jung-yul has slightly modified the original character to Toei Animation.Copyright of the Black Rubber Shoes comics was so popular that it was produced in 2000 (the second Black Rubber Shoes) and 2004 (the third Black Rubber Shoes).Since 2004, he has been publishing comics and has been in contact with Lee Yeong-il and the late Lee Woo-young.The publisher claims to have planned the plot and character of the black rubber shoe work, decided the direction of the work, and was deeply involved in the creation of the black rubber shoe work.The black rubber shoe was not an art work registered with the Copyright committee, so there was a limit to the protection of Copyright, and in consultation with the authors, the author was registered with the Copyright committee.When Lee Woo-young was in the military, his brother asked for his brothers share because his brother took the place of serialization. He accepted it and received 36% of the shares in black rubber shoes, Lee Yeong-il 27% Lee Woo Young 27% % And Lee Woo-jin became 10%.Toei Animation was included in the contract and paid the investment to activate the black rubber shoes. The black rubber shoes 4th Toei Animation ranked first in the audience rating and won many awards.The success of the black rubber shoes and the commercialization of the character were attributed to the investment and aggressive marketing of the company.The beginning of the dispute came when writer Lee Woo-young asked for the return of his stake in Black Rubber Shoes in 2018.Lee Woo-young writes that all contracts are invalid because he will do business directly with the company, and he sent proof of contents to KBS, Saehan fairy tale, and licensing companies.Lee Woo-young did not know and did not agree with the 4th Toei Animation, the contract was invalid, and the authors registration was wrong.He also argued that the contract was made and the original authors share was reduced too much.When creating Toei Animation, he added that only 3% of the original authors were allowed to go, and that even this was distributed according to the Character Copyright holding ratio.Lee Woo-young explains that the brother-in-law received 4.35 million won for four years until he made four black rubber shoes with KBS.According to the details of the contract payments submitted by the author, Lee Woo-young received 10.42 million won from the first quarter of 2014 to the first quarter of 2020.He also filed a civil lawsuit worth 100 million won, saying that Lee Woo-young had drawn comics elsewhere.Lee Woo-young said in an interview with a number of media, I have been in conflict since I asked for the correction of an unfair contract without a contract period, and I was finally accused.In addition, the movie Black Rubber Shin also added, I did not ask permission from the original author, and I have not paid a small amount of original fee.Lee Woo-young said, We are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a character agency for drawing a cartoon depicting a black rubber character without their permission. Why should the original author draw a cartoon with the permission of a character agency? I am confused about why I have to be tried, but I believe it will be resolved as it is. Although it is based on the black rubber shoes, the Toei Animation Character is a different one that revised and supplemented the original.He argues that Contract, which was made according to the practice at the time, can not be compared with the recent Contract Standard.It is quite difficult to understand that the settlement of the original character of the popular character is 10.42 million won. It may not have been a legal problem. However, the value of creation is that the creators efforts are not respected.The lawsuit over the black rubber shoes was caused by the comprehensive and exclusive transfer of Copyright owned by the creator in the name of business. The cartoon world sees it as an unfair contract.Baek Hee and the writer of Cloud Bread have also been sued and lost. It is law to protect creators in unfair situations. It seems urgent to improve the law to protect creators.
The creator of the character is light, and only the publisher and distributor platform pockets are heavy.There are many irrational incidents in the publishing industry in which the value of creation is not respected. Unfair Contracts, in which only the creator becomes a hukou (very dangerous situation or circumstances) are repeated, but it is rare to take issue.Because the law doesnt protect the creator.Writer Lee Woo-young, who created the character Black Rubber God on the 11th, has been suing the character agency Hyungseol Publishing Co. (hereinafter referred to as Hyungseol) for violating Copyright since 2018.Lee Woo-young was the one who was accused of violating Copyright.The Black Rubber Shoes serialized in Boy Champ from 1992 to 2006 is a comic cartoon depicting the stories of elementary school students, middle school students, and their families in the background of Seoul in the 1960s.Lee Woo-young and Lee Woo-jin painted and Lee Yeong-il wrote. At that time, the longest-running serial record was set and 45 books were published.I got a confirmation of the facts about the background of the black rubber shin dispute.In 1998, Black Rubber Shoe was reborn as Toei Animation by investing in KBS and Saehan Donghwas production of Song Jung-yul.Toei Animation Character, which is familiar to us, is not much different from the original character, although Song Jung-yul has slightly modified the original character to Toei Animation.Copyright of the Black Rubber Shoes comics was so popular that it was produced in 2000 (the second Black Rubber Shoes) and 2004 (the third Black Rubber Shoes).Since 2004, he has been publishing comics and has been in contact with Lee Yeong-il and the late Lee Woo-young.The publisher claims to have planned the plot and character of the black rubber shoe work, decided the direction of the work, and was deeply involved in the creation of the black rubber shoe work.The black rubber shoe was not an art work registered with the Copyright committee, so there was a limit to the protection of Copyright, and in consultation with the authors, the author was registered with the Copyright committee.When Lee Woo-young was in the military, his brother asked for his brothers share because his brother took the place of serialization. He accepted it and received 36% of the shares in black rubber shoes, Lee Yeong-il 27% Lee Woo Young 27% % And Lee Woo-jin became 10%.Toei Animation was included in the contract and paid the investment to activate the black rubber shoes. The black rubber shoes 4th Toei Animation ranked first in the audience rating and won many awards.The success of the black rubber shoes and the commercialization of the character were attributed to the investment and aggressive marketing of the company.The beginning of the dispute came when writer Lee Woo-young asked for the return of his stake in Black Rubber Shoes in 2018.Lee Woo-young writes that all contracts are invalid because he will do business directly with the company, and he sent proof of contents to KBS, Saehan fairy tale, and licensing companies.Lee Woo-young did not know and did not agree with the 4th Toei Animation, the contract was invalid, and the authors registration was wrong.He also argued that the contract was made and the original authors share was reduced too much.When creating Toei Animation, he added that only 3% of the original authors were allowed to go, and that even this was distributed according to the Character Copyright holding ratio.Lee Woo-young explains that the brother-in-law received 4.35 million won for four years until he made four black rubber shoes with KBS.According to the details of the contract payments submitted by the author, Lee Woo-young received 10.42 million won from the first quarter of 2014 to the first quarter of 2020.He also filed a civil lawsuit worth 100 million won, saying that Lee Woo-young had drawn comics elsewhere.Lee Woo-young said in an interview with a number of media, I have been in conflict since I asked for the correction of an unfair contract without a contract period, and I was finally accused.In addition, the movie Black Rubber Shin also added, I did not ask permission from the original author, and I have not paid a small amount of original fee.Lee Woo-young said, We are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a character agency for drawing a cartoon depicting a black rubber character without their permission. Why should the original author draw a cartoon with the permission of a character agency? I am confused about why I have to be tried, but I believe it will be resolved as it is. Although it is based on the black rubber shoes, the Toei Animation Character is a different one that revised and supplemented the original.He argues that Contract, which was made according to the practice at the time, can not be compared with the recent Contract Standard.It is quite difficult to understand that the settlement of the original character of the popular character is 10.42 million won. It may not have been a legal problem. However, the value of creation is that the creators efforts are not respected.The lawsuit over the black rubber shoes was caused by the comprehensive and exclusive transfer of Copyright owned by the creator in the name of business. The cartoon world sees it as an unfair contract.Baek Hee and the writer of Cloud Bread have also been sued and lost. It is law to protect creators in unfair situations. It seems urgent to improve the law to protect creators.
The creator of the character is light, and only the publisher and distributor platform pockets are heavy.There are many irrational incidents in the publishing industry in which the value of creation is not respected. Unfair Contracts, in which only the creator becomes a hukou (very dangerous situation or circumstances) are repeated, but it is rare to take issue.Because the law doesnt protect the creator.Writer Lee Woo-young, who created the character Black Rubber God on the 11th, has been suing the character agency Hyungseol Publishing Co. (hereinafter referred to as Hyungseol) for violating Copyright since 2018.Lee Woo-young was the one who was accused of violating Copyright.The Black Rubber Shoes serialized in Boy Champ from 1992 to 2006 is a comic cartoon depicting the stories of elementary school students, middle school students, and their families in the background of Seoul in the 1960s.Lee Woo-young and Lee Woo-jin painted and Lee Yeong-il wrote. At that time, the longest-running serial record was set and 45 books were published.I got a confirmation of the facts about the background of the black rubber shin dispute.In 1998, Black Rubber Shoe was reborn as Toei Animation by investing in KBS and Saehan Donghwas production of Song Jung-yul.Toei Animation Character, which is familiar to us, is not much different from the original character, although Song Jung-yul has slightly modified the original character to Toei Animation.Copyright of the Black Rubber Shoes comics was so popular that it was produced in 2000 (the second Black Rubber Shoes) and 2004 (the third Black Rubber Shoes).Since 2004, he has been publishing comics and has been in contact with Lee Yeong-il and the late Lee Woo-young.The publisher claims to have planned the plot and character of the black rubber shoe work, decided the direction of the work, and was deeply involved in the creation of the black rubber shoe work.The black rubber shoe was not an art work registered with the Copyright committee, so there was a limit to the protection of Copyright, and in consultation with the authors, the author was registered with the Copyright committee.When Lee Woo-young was in the military, his brother asked for his brothers share because his brother took the place of serialization. He accepted it and received 36% of the shares in black rubber shoes, Lee Yeong-il 27% Lee Woo Young 27% % And Lee Woo-jin became 10%.Toei Animation was included in the contract and paid the investment to activate the black rubber shoes. The black rubber shoes 4th Toei Animation ranked first in the audience rating and won many awards.The success of the black rubber shoes and the commercialization of the character were attributed to the investment and aggressive marketing of the company.The beginning of the dispute came when writer Lee Woo-young asked for the return of his stake in Black Rubber Shoes in 2018.Lee Woo-young writes that all contracts are invalid because he will do business directly with the company, and he sent proof of contents to KBS, Saehan fairy tale, and licensing companies.Lee Woo-young did not know and did not agree with the 4th Toei Animation, the contract was invalid, and the authors registration was wrong.He also argued that the contract was made and the original authors share was reduced too much.When creating Toei Animation, he added that only 3% of the original authors were allowed to go, and that even this was distributed according to the Character Copyright holding ratio.Lee Woo-young explains that the brother-in-law received 4.35 million won for four years until he made four black rubber shoes with KBS.According to the details of the contract payments submitted by the author, Lee Woo-young received 10.42 million won from the first quarter of 2014 to the first quarter of 2020.He also filed a civil lawsuit worth 100 million won, saying that Lee Woo-young had drawn comics elsewhere.Lee Woo-young said in an interview with a number of media, I have been in conflict since I asked for the correction of an unfair contract without a contract period, and I was finally accused.In addition, the movie Black Rubber Shin also added, I did not ask permission from the original author, and I have not paid a small amount of original fee.Lee Woo-young said, We are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a character agency for drawing a cartoon depicting a black rubber character without their permission. Why should the original author draw a cartoon with the permission of a character agency? I am confused about why I have to be tried, but I believe it will be resolved as it is. Although it is based on the black rubber shoes, the Toei Animation Character is a different one that revised and supplemented the original.He argues that Contract, which was made according to the practice at the time, can not be compared with the recent Contract Standard.It is quite difficult to understand that the settlement of the original character of the popular character is 10.42 million won. It may not have been a legal problem. However, the value of creation is that the creators efforts are not respected.The lawsuit over the black rubber shoes was caused by the comprehensive and exclusive transfer of Copyright owned by the creator in the name of business. The cartoon world sees it as an unfair contract.Baek Hee and the writer of Cloud Bread have also been sued and lost. It is law to protect creators in unfair situations. It seems urgent to improve the law to protect creators.

The creator of the Character is light, and only the publisher and distributor platform pockets are heavy. There are many irrational incidents in the publishing industry in which the value of creation is not respected. "Unfair Contracts, in which only the creator becomes a hukou (very dangerous situation or circumstances) are repeated, but it is rare to take issue. Because the law doesn't protect the creator. Writer Lee Woo-young, who created the Character "Black Rubber God" on the 11th, has been suing the Character agency Hyungseol Publishing Co. (hereinafter referred to as Hyungseol) for violating Copyright since 2018. Lee Woo-young was the one who was accused of violating Copyright. The 'Black Rubber Shoes' serialized in 'Boy Champ' from 1992 to 2006 is a comic cartoon depicting the stories of elementary school students, middle school students, and their families in the background of Seoul in the 1960s. Lee Woo-young and Lee Woo-jin painted and Lee Yeong-il wrote. "At that time, the longest-running serial record was set and 45 books were published. I got a confirmation of the facts about the background of the "black rubber shin" dispute. In 1998, 'Black Rubber Shoe' was reborn as Toei Animation by investing in KBS and Saehan Donghwa's production of Song Jung-yul. Toei Animation Character, which is familiar to us, is not much different from the original Character, although Song Jung-yul has slightly modified the original Character to Toei Animation. Copyright of the "Black Rubber Shoes" comics was so popular that it was produced in 2000 (the second Black Rubber Shoes) and 2004 (the third Black Rubber Shoes). Since 2004, he has been publishing comics and has been in contact with Lee Yeong-il and the late Lee Woo-young. The publisher claims to have planned the plot and Character of the 'black rubber shoe' work, decided the direction of the work, and was deeply involved in the creation of the 'black rubber shoe' work. The 'black rubber shoe' was not an art work registered with the Copyright committee, so there was a limit to the protection of Copyright, and in consultation with the authors, the author was registered with the Copyright committee. When Lee Woo-young was in the military, his brother asked for his brother's share because his brother took the place of serialization. He accepted it and received 36% of the shares in 'black rubber shoes', Lee Yeong-il 27% Lee Woo Young 27% % And Lee Woo-jin became 10%. Toei Animation was included in the Contract and paid the investment to activate the 'black rubber shoes'. The 'black rubber shoes' 4th Toei Animation ranked first in the audience rating and won many awards. The success of the 'black rubber shoes' and the commercialization of the Character were attributed to the investment and aggressive marketing of the company. The beginning of the dispute came when writer Lee Woo-young asked for the return of his stake in "Black Rubber Shoes" in 2018. Lee Woo-young writes that all Contracts are invalid because he will do business directly with the company, and he sent proof of contents to KBS, Saehan fairy tale, and licensing companies. Lee Woo-young did not know and did not agree with the 4th Toei Animation, the Contract was invalid, and the author's registration was wrong. He also argued that the Contract was made and the original author's share was reduced too much. When creating Toei Animation, he added that only 3% of the original authors were allowed to go, and that even this was distributed according to the Character Copyright holding ratio. Lee Woo-young explains that the brother-in-law received 4.35 million won for four years until he made four "black rubber shoes" with KBS. According to the details of the Contract payments submitted by the author, Lee Woo-young received 10.42 million won from the first quarter of 2014 to the first quarter of 2020. He also filed a civil lawsuit worth 100 million won, saying that Lee Woo-young had drawn comics elsewhere. Lee Woo-young said in an interview with a number of media, "I have been in conflict since I asked for the correction of an unfair Contract without a Contract period, and I was finally accused." In addition, the movie "Black Rubber Shin" also added, "I did not ask permission from the original author, and I have not paid a small amount of original fee." Lee Woo-young said, "We are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a Character agency for drawing a cartoon depicting a black rubber Character without their permission." "Why should the original author draw a cartoon with the permission of a Character agency? I am confused about why I have to be tried, but I believe it will be resolved as it is. " Although it is based on the 'black rubber shoes', the Toei Animation Character is a different one that revised and supplemented the original. He argues that Contract, which was made according to the practice at the time, can not be compared with the recent Contract Standard. It is quite difficult to understand that the settlement of the original Character of the popular Character is 10.42 million won. "It may not have been a legal problem." However, the value of creation is that the creator's efforts are not respected. The lawsuit over the "black rubber shoes" was caused by the comprehensive and exclusive transfer of Copyright owned by the creator in the name of business. The cartoon world sees it as an unfair Contract. Baek Hee and the writer of Cloud Bread have also been sued and lost. It is law to protect creators in unfair situations. It seems urgent to improve the law to protect creators.