Lim Young-woong and Music Bank' fundamental question about the existence of broadcast frequency scores

on
Recently, Music Bank has been at the center of controversy.In KBS 2TV Music Bank broadcast on the 13th, Singer Lim Young-woong scored high in digital soundtrack score and music score, but he did not get the first place with 0 points in the number of broadcasts.There are various controversies and criticisms about Music Bank are being raised. In this article, we will talk only about the number of broadcasts (hereinafter referred to as broadcast scores) itself, except for the uncertain part.All the allegations being raised are just speculation, and suppose Lim Young-woong got a zero score on the air because the score measurements went really well.And I think thats why I did not get the top spot in Music Bank.In this situation, is there no problem at all?I do not know what kind of broadcasts Music Bank adds up, but I can see what is missing.It was news, and after PSYs Gangnam Style craze, the news fell out of Music Bank broadcast score.The exception of the reporting program from the number of broadcasts is from December 2012, said Music Bank PD at the time of the controversy over PSY Gentleman broadcast score in 2013. The news is broadcast several times a day once a clip is made, so it does not fit in the majority of programs and equity that are broadcast once a week.Related article: Music Bank, changes to broadcast score standards...PSY Gentleman No. 1 orientation? (/April 19, 2013)Controversy over the song program ranking system surrounding Gentleman (Union News / April 19, 2013)The direction is different, but there was a controversy about broadcasting score about 10 years ago.The reason for the controversy a decade ago is simple, because I do not think that the explanation at that time was a cool year.It is a very natural story, but score in the ranking system should have representative about something.The reason why soundtrack score is recognized is because there is a kind of consensus that the singer has gained popularity because the soundtrack score is high. The reason why the record score is recognized for its existence is that the view that high record score can be seen as an indicator of the strength of the artist fandom is persuasive.So, what does the current number of broadcasts represent, and what is the possibility that the viewers will accept that the claim is convincing when they claim to represent something?Unlike the explanation of Music Bank PD 10 years ago, the broadcast score during the PSY Gangnam Style craze was worth noting that it is not equitable even if it is seen again in 2022.In 2012, Gangnam Style was a big hit that year, the number one hit on the soundtrack chart, but even that huge soundtrack score was hard to see as it captured the international craze of Gangnam Style and the citizens interest in it.In the end, soundtrack score shows what performance was made on the domestic soundtrack chart.It was the broadcasting score at the time that complemented the limit of the soundtrack score, and the broadcasting score of PSY Gangnam Style functions enough as evidence to guess the situation at the time.How great the song was, how much the craze was at that time, how long it was worth the news street, and so on.Who can explain the current Music Bank broadcast score, which is removed, as This score has such value and such representation?Even if Lim Young-woong is normally 0, this score means only one thing.Even Lim Young-woong can not be ranked first without broadcasting score.What can you read besides the fact that you have a lot of loyal listeners in Korea and that you can not be the number one player if you sell more than 1 million copies in a week after the album sales as a trot singer.This Signal goes to The Artist who did not finish first, but also to Han The Artist.If you do not appear in KBS content during the next activity due to the reasons of the schedule, you will learn that you can not get the first prize even if you get better grades.Who is the one who gets the benefit of learning this fact at the same time to Singer who did not finish first and Singer who ranked first?In large terms, this problem is also a problem of the whole music broadcasting system.If music broadcasting announces the way to calculate the number one, should it just accept it? How much is it appropriate to recognize the discretion of broadcasting stations and music broadcasting?There are enough topics to seriously discuss, such as whether it is reasonable to exclude the first candidate from the top candidate for not appearing in music broadcasting, and whether it is justified to adjust the score of a specific field without convincing explanation.There are not many cases where the issue is not as big as now, but it is not a topic because there is no problem before.In fact, if the first place in the music broadcast has only the meaning of Singer 1 to give XX to NN Day, it may not ask this question.But there are still a lot of people who care about the first place, and as long as the first candidate or the actual first place still influences someones career, we have to ask questions.How best you are doing as a broadcast that gives someone the top spot.Photo = Fish Music - Music Bank
Recently, Music Bank has been at the center of controversy.In KBS 2TV Music Bank broadcast on the 13th, Singer Lim Young-woong scored high in digital soundtrack score and music score, but he did not get the first place with 0 points in the number of broadcasts.There are various controversies and criticisms about Music Bank are being raised. In this article, we will talk only about the number of broadcasts (hereinafter referred to as broadcast scores) itself, except for the uncertain part.All the allegations being raised are just speculation, and suppose Lim Young-woong got a zero score on the air because the score measurements went really well.And I think thats why I did not get the top spot in Music Bank.In this situation, is there no problem at all?I do not know what kind of broadcasts Music Bank adds up, but I can see what is missing.It was news, and after PSYs Gangnam Style craze, the news fell out of Music Bank broadcast score.The exception of the reporting program from the number of broadcasts is from December 2012, said Music Bank PD at the time of the controversy over PSY Gentleman broadcast score in 2013. The news is broadcast several times a day once a clip is made, so it does not fit in the majority of programs and equity that are broadcast once a week.Related article: Music Bank, changes to broadcast score standards...PSY Gentleman No. 1 orientation? (/April 19, 2013)Controversy over the song program ranking system surrounding Gentleman (Union News / April 19, 2013)The direction is different, but there was a controversy about broadcasting score about 10 years ago.The reason for the controversy a decade ago is simple, because I do not think that the explanation at that time was a cool year.It is a very natural story, but score in the ranking system should have representative about something.The reason why soundtrack score is recognized is because there is a kind of consensus that the singer has gained popularity because the soundtrack score is high. The reason why the record score is recognized for its existence is that the view that high record score can be seen as an indicator of the strength of the artist fandom is persuasive.So, what does the current number of broadcasts represent, and what is the possibility that the viewers will accept that the claim is convincing when they claim to represent something?Unlike the explanation of Music Bank PD 10 years ago, the broadcast score during the PSY Gangnam Style craze was worth noting that it is not equitable even if it is seen again in 2022.In 2012, Gangnam Style was a big hit that year, the number one hit on the soundtrack chart, but even that huge soundtrack score was hard to see as it captured the international craze of Gangnam Style and the citizens interest in it.In the end, soundtrack score shows what performance was made on the domestic soundtrack chart.It was the broadcasting score at the time that complemented the limit of the soundtrack score, and the broadcasting score of PSY Gangnam Style functions enough as evidence to guess the situation at the time.How great the song was, how much the craze was at that time, how long it was worth the news street, and so on.Who can explain the current Music Bank broadcast score, which is removed, as This score has such value and such representation?Even if Lim Young-woong is normally 0, this score means only one thing.Even Lim Young-woong can not be ranked first without broadcasting score.What can you read besides the fact that you have a lot of loyal listeners in Korea and that you can not be the number one player if you sell more than 1 million copies in a week after the album sales as a trot singer.This Signal goes to The Artist who did not finish first, but also to Han The Artist.If you do not appear in KBS content during the next activity due to the reasons of the schedule, you will learn that you can not get the first prize even if you get better grades.Who is the one who gets the benefit of learning this fact at the same time to Singer who did not finish first and Singer who ranked first?In large terms, this problem is also a problem of the whole music broadcasting system.If music broadcasting announces the way to calculate the number one, should it just accept it? How much is it appropriate to recognize the discretion of broadcasting stations and music broadcasting?There are enough topics to seriously discuss, such as whether it is reasonable to exclude the first candidate from the top candidate for not appearing in music broadcasting, and whether it is justified to adjust the score of a specific field without convincing explanation.There are not many cases where the issue is not as big as now, but it is not a topic because there is no problem before.In fact, if the first place in the music broadcast has only the meaning of Singer 1 to give XX to NN Day, it may not ask this question.But there are still a lot of people who care about the first place, and as long as the first candidate or the actual first place still influences someones career, we have to ask questions.How best you are doing as a broadcast that gives someone the top spot.Photo = Fish Music - Music Bank

Recently, Music Bank has been at the center of controversy.

In KBS 2TV Music Bank' broadcast on the 13th, Singer Lim Young-woong scored high in 'digital soundtrack score' and 'music score', but he did not get the first place with 0 points in the number of broadcasts.

There are various controversies and criticisms about Music Bank are being raised. In this article, we will talk only about the number of broadcasts (hereinafter referred to as broadcast scores) itself, except for the uncertain part.

All the allegations being raised are just speculation, and suppose Lim Young-woong got a zero score on the air because the score measurements went really well. And I think that's why I did not get the top spot in Music Bank'.

In this situation, is there no problem at all?

I do not know what kind of broadcasts Music Bank adds up, but I can see what is missing.

It was news, and after PSY's 'Gangnam Style' craze, the news fell out of Music Bank' broadcast score.

"The exception of the reporting program from the number of broadcasts is from December 2012," said Music Bank PD at the time of the controversy over PSY Gentleman' broadcast score in 2013. "The news is broadcast several times a day once a clip is made, so it does not fit in the majority of programs and equity that are broadcast once a week."

Related article: Music Bank, changes to broadcast score standards...PSY Gentleman' No. 1 orientation? (/April 19, 2013)

Controversy over the song program ranking system surrounding "Gentleman" (Union News / April 19, 2013)

The direction is different, but there was a controversy about broadcasting score about 10 years ago.

The reason for the controversy a decade ago is simple, because I do not think that the explanation at that time was a cool year.

It is a very natural story, but 'score' in the ranking system should have 'representative' about something.

The reason why soundtrack score is recognized is because there is a kind of consensus that "the Singer has gained popularity because the soundtrack score is high." The reason why the record score is recognized for its existence is that the view that "high record score can be seen as an indicator of the strength of the artist fandom" is persuasive.

So, what does the current number of broadcasts represent, and what is the possibility that the viewers will accept that the claim is convincing when they claim to represent something?

Unlike the explanation of Music Bank PD 10 years ago, the broadcast score during the PSY 'Gangnam Style' craze was worth noting that it is "not equitable" even if it is seen again in 2022.

In 2012, “Gangnam Style” was a big hit that year, the number one hit on the soundtrack chart, but even that huge soundtrack score was hard to see as it captured the international craze of “Gangnam Style” and the citizens’ interest in it. In the end, soundtrack score shows what performance was made on the domestic soundtrack chart.

It was the broadcasting score at the time that complemented the limit of the soundtrack score, and the broadcasting score of PSY 'Gangnam Style' functions enough as evidence to guess the situation at the time. How great the song was, how much the craze was at that time, how long it was worth the news street, and so on.

Who can explain the current Music Bank' broadcast score, which is removed, as "This score has such value and such representation"?

Even if Lim Young-woong is normally 0, this score means only one thing.

"Even Lim Young-woong can not be ranked first without broadcasting score."

What can you read besides the fact that you have a lot of loyal listeners in Korea and that you can not be the number one player if you sell more than 1 million copies in a week after the album sales as a trot Singer.

This Signal goes to The Artist who did not finish first, but also to 'Han' The Artist. If you do not appear in KBS content during the next activity due to the reasons of the schedule, you will learn that you can not get the first prize even if you get better grades. Who is the one who gets the benefit of learning this fact at the same time to Singer who did not finish first and Singer who ranked first?

In large terms, this problem is also a problem of the whole music broadcasting system.

If music broadcasting announces the way to calculate the number one, should it just accept it? How much is it appropriate to recognize the discretion of broadcasting stations and music broadcasting?

There are enough topics to seriously discuss, such as whether it is reasonable to exclude the first candidate from the top candidate for not appearing in music broadcasting, and whether it is justified to adjust the score of a specific field without convincing explanation. There are not many cases where the issue is not as big as now, but it is not a topic because there is no problem before.

In fact, if the first place in the music broadcast has only the meaning of "Singer 1 to give XX to NN Day", it may not ask this question.

But there are still a lot of people who care about the first place, and as long as the first candidate or the actual first place still influences someone's career, we have to ask questions.

How best you are doing as a broadcast that gives someone the top spot.

Photo = Fish Music - Music Bank