The abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. These seven letters hit South Korea. The attacks on the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family have always been, but the size of the snowballs the presidential candidate shot has increased and become a pledge.
With the election of the presidential candidate for the power of the Yoon Seok-ryul people, many people pay attention to the fate of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. Although there was a small internal debate about how many times it was abolished or reorganized, it is a certain atmosphere that it will be abolished. By the way, can we really abolish the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family? On the 15th, MBC <PD Note> 'Gender Conflict and Women's Family' side dealt with this controversy surrounding the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family.
Singer-songwriter Hotfeld from One The Girls revealed that he was an Obafemi Martinsist, and read and commented on the book and movie "Kim Ji Young" in 1982. Hotfeld told the production crew, "'(Among the contents of Kim Ji Young, born in 1982) is this happening in the world?' This is not true, "he said," It is still happening to some extent. "It was not special to reveal that I am an Obafemi Martinsist.
But for someOne, this must have been a sure prey. Youtuber "Duck" posted several videos criticizing him for hot felt material. In fact, it has taken a kind of 'coordinate' to those who are against Obafemi Martins. The gang also accused BJ, who was suspected of making a "sex statement," of being Obafemi Martins. The BJ, who was suffering from malicious comments, made an extreme choice, so if he is judged (self-determined) as 'Obafemi Martins', he must take criticism that he can not afford from then on.
Celebrities and celebrities don’t just go through this. Teachers who try gender equality education at school are also subjected to a formidable protest. Elementary school teachers who appeared on the new media channel 'Dotface' and appealed to the need for gender equality education were branded 'male hate' and had to take a two-year leave. He returned to work, but was left on leave again because of trauma. Another teacher who tries to educate gender equality tells him that he should worry about threats, rantings, and personal hair.
There are various reasons for the degree of misogynistic attacks becoming worse day by day, but it is also because the political party has boarded this atmosphere. There has been an attempt to listen to a series of voices attacking Obafemi Martins, centering on the power of the people, and the abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family can be seen as a pledge that broke out at the peak of such attempts. The Ministry of Gender Equality and Family is the opinion of citizens in favor of the abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, such as 'the Ministry of Gender Equality has implemented a policy to divide men and women, not a policy for women'. However, the problem is that politicians who have to feel responsible are also on board these opinions.
The most common policy in the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family is the One-parent project, and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family is a real unrestrainable existence for single-parent families. It is not only that, it is the core organization that implements policies to correct discrimination factors hidden throughout everyday life, such as reemployment of women who have lost their careers or recovery of victims of sex crimes. They should worry that if the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family is abolished, One important issue will be cut off.
Jung Jae-hoon, a professor at Seoul Women's University, said that the abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family will not happen anyway. "(Ministry of Gender Equality and Family abolition pledge) is a kind of fishing rather than an expression of will."
If so, do you really believe that the abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family will reduce gender conflicts and improve women's human rights? Rather, the broadcast has left a task for those who are worried that more social costs will be incurred than now and that conflicts and antagonism will not be repeated.