"Dogs Are Incredible" abolition pros and cons debate should be done first." The comparisons are protesting against the absurd debate agenda proposed by 'Gaoungung'.
KBS2 Dogs Are Incredible' (hereinafter referred to as 'Gae-Gyeong-ryung') proposed a 100-time debate on October 28 through official Instagram. The agenda was 'Muth plugs mandatory when going out to the middle dogs'.
The netizens pointed out that "I can not make a fight." Regardless of the size of the public, Pet needs a Mouth plugs, which means that pointing out 'Large dogs' can encourage false prejudice. The main reason is that setting up such an agenda itself encourages discomfort to the middle dogs and the dogs.
Above all, the anger of viewers reached the peak because it was a debate that appeared ahead of the 100th special feature. This is because the Korea's representative Pet entertainment program, which has been on air for the second year, has selected the most sensitive topics for the comPetitors. There is a suspicion that "I am trying to raise the audience rating by putting a fight on purpose".
Unfortunately, the 'Gaeulung' side has not made any position on the 5th day of the controversy. Planning that does not get the sympathy of viewers should be criticized, but the delay response that does not correct it is worse. While 'Ganghungung' did not cope with anything, the explanation became the part of Kang Hyung-wook trainer.
Kang Hyung-wook said on his 31st day, "I think there are a lot of people who are upset because of the Mouth plugs. Don't worry. I never think all dogs should do Mouth plugs. " "I will never let all Pets fill the Mouth plugs," he said.
Kang Hyung-wook has released his position directly when some netizens have criticized Kang Hyung-wook 's official SNS. Kang Hyung-wook proposed the subject, and Kang Hyung-wook took a position, but Kang Hyung-wook bowed down to the audience's hearts.
The production team's uneasiness caused controversy, and the absurd situation that the performers were explaining it happened. Nevertheless, the "Gaeulung" side is not taking official action. There are nearly 3,500 comments posted by 'Gaeulung', and 340 comments were posted on Kang Hyung-wook . The public opinion is not sinking so much that the abolition of 'Gaeulung' is said to be the priority. What is the idea of Gaeulung?
The program is 100 times, which is a special meaning for the production team as well as viewers. In the case of 'Gaeulung', which presented a program that focused on education by breaking the framework of existing animal entertainment that was only introducing cute and beautiful companion animals, the meaning is more different. Through 'Gaeulung', the gaze of Pet changed, and the responsibility of the rivals changed. The boundary between the companion and the non-relative was broken down, and it felt like going to a happy companion animal society together.
However, the present 'Gaeulung' seems to have reversed 100 times in front of the nose. We are proposing to divide Pet into sizes and debate about filling the Mouth plugs by judging that it is threatening when it is large. It confronts the purpose of 'Gae-jung', which emphasized that it is not a Pet but a problem.
'Gaeul-ryung' should answer the voice of viewers even in order not to forsake the time that has been sweating for the past two years. Whether you modify the details or explain your intentions clearly, it seems difficult to calm down this situation without communication with viewers.