It is Danger who will face a backlash by driving the netizens who raised the controversy about false explanation to the flamer.
It seems to be an inappropriate response to blame the netizen for the past behavior and the Daechi stationed words.
On October 25, Cho Min-a appeared on SBS Plus 'Love Ceramic Season 2' and said, "I had a hygiene problem during the business operation at the Atelier." I put a 500 won bill in the oven to fix the heritage site. A part-time student posted a picture on his SNS and spread the story, but it became like I did. There were 500 reports to the hygiene department. "
However, Cho Min-ah's remarks did not match his blog posts in the past. In the past, Cho Min-ah revealed the bread production process on his blog, saying, "When I first baked Dakuaz, the dough was covered with all the dough because of the craze. Those 500 won "and posted a 500 won coin on the heritage site and posted a picture of bread and baking.
The explanation that the part-time student was doing the act and not the picture posted on his SNS was all false. The viewers who watched this naturally responded, "Why do I lie when I saw it on my blog?" And "Why do you blame part-time students?"
So far, it was a level of happening that Cho Min-ah could solve. It may not have been as accurate as it was old, or there may have been stories that others did not know. However, Cho Min-ah's response was not to clarify the exact explanation, but to shoot the netizens who raised the criticism opinion as a flammer.
On November 29, Cho Min-a said, "I make a controversy as if I want to pay back the anger accumulated in the world. How valuable is it if you take out crooked blades that unilaterally cut others and make constructive efforts for yourself? "
Of course, there may have been a bad idea among the opinions toward Cho Min-ah. However, most netizens questioned the writings left by Cho Min-ah on the blog and the remarks made by Daechi station and demanded explanation. It is too much to think that it is a bad idea to ask for clarification that the writings left directly and the remarks made directly do not match.
In the past, Jo Min-a, who is aiming for active "communication" with blogs and SNS, is sad to see her ears closed in criticism while leaving heart emoticons in praise and cheering comments.
I am worried that Cho Min-ah, who has suffered a Danger once in the Atelier case, has misunderstood in the process of explaining the same case, and now he is facing a backlash with an attitude that does not even explain it.