Kim So-hye, who called "School violence Victims," punished "attacker" on School violence Reversal story...

on
Kim So-hye, a member of the group Io Ai, was caught up in the controversy over the false explanation of school violence.A netizen A, who raised Kim So-hyes suspicion of school violence, said in an online community on the 28th, I was sued for defamation by disseminating false facts after writing the disclosure at the beginning of the year.I did not agree eventually, but I was decided to dismiss the police. In addition, the police also released the reason for the dispatch.According to the report, Kim So-hye claims that the articles written by the suspect (A) are false, but the contents of the minutes of the Second School Violence Measures Autonomy Committee held at the Sookmyung Womens Middle School on May 24, 2012 show that the actual complainant was found to be an attackr of school violence, such as kneeling B in front of his friends.Police concluded the case without charges, judging that Kim So-hye had been punished by the school violence committee and that it was difficult to say that As claim was slanderous.The school violence was falsely suspected.Kim So-hye agency S & P Entertainment said on February 27, Malicious rumors claiming Kim So-hyes school violence were posted on the online site, and in February, the complaint was filed and requested an investigation.In the course of legal response, the distributor was specified, the distributor stated that he posted rumors in curiosity, and the police investigation revealed that the contents were false.The suspect who claimed the harassment was rather one of the attackers in the school violence case where Kim So-hye was Victims at the time of Middle School.The suspect wrote a malicious rumor with jealousy and submitted a statement saying that he regretted it and regretted it. Kim So-hye said, I have never proposed an agreement to drop the complaint to Mr. A.Some facts have been made to decide the miscarriage, but it is true that Mr. A spread false facts. In sum, Mr. A and Kim So-hyes claims are not the victims of school violence.But it is true that Kim So-hye was summoned to the School violet Commission for the School violet against Mr. B when he was a first-year student at Middle School.Kim So-hye said that he had solved the misunderstanding with Mr. B at the time, but the results of the police investigation based on the minutes were actually proved to be an attackr and dismissed.As a result, there is a false explanation, but Kim So-hye is still in a position to be unjust and the controversy is expected to continue for the time being.Kim So-hye is set to release the movie Your Order
Kim So-hye, a member of the group Io Ai, was caught up in the controversy over the false explanation of school violence.A netizen A, who raised Kim So-hyes suspicion of school violence, said in an online community on the 28th, I was sued for defamation by disseminating false facts after writing the disclosure at the beginning of the year.I did not agree eventually, but I was decided to dismiss the police. In addition, the police also released the reason for the dispatch.According to the report, Kim So-hye claims that the articles written by the suspect (A) are false, but the contents of the minutes of the Second School Violence Measures Autonomy Committee held at the Sookmyung Womens Middle School on May 24, 2012 show that the actual complainant was found to be an attackr of school violence, such as kneeling B in front of his friends.Police concluded the case without charges, judging that Kim So-hye had been punished by the school violence committee and that it was difficult to say that As claim was slanderous.The school violence was falsely suspected.Kim So-hye agency S & P Entertainment said on February 27, Malicious rumors claiming Kim So-hyes school violence were posted on the online site, and in February, the complaint was filed and requested an investigation.In the course of legal response, the distributor was specified, the distributor stated that he posted rumors in curiosity, and the police investigation revealed that the contents were false.The suspect who claimed the harassment was rather one of the attackers in the school violence case where Kim So-hye was Victims at the time of Middle School.The suspect wrote a malicious rumor with jealousy and submitted a statement saying that he regretted it and regretted it. Kim So-hye said, I have never proposed an agreement to drop the complaint to Mr. A.Some facts have been made to decide the miscarriage, but it is true that Mr. A spread false facts. In sum, Mr. A and Kim So-hyes claims are not the victims of school violence.But it is true that Kim So-hye was summoned to the School violet Commission for the School violet against Mr. B when he was a first-year student at Middle School.Kim So-hye said that he had solved the misunderstanding with Mr. B at the time, but the results of the police investigation based on the minutes were actually proved to be an attackr and dismissed.As a result, there is a false explanation, but Kim So-hye is still in a position to be unjust and the controversy is expected to continue for the time being.Kim So-hye is set to release the movie Your Order

Kim So-hye, a member of the group Io Ai, was caught up in the controversy over the false explanation of School violence.

A netizen A, who raised Kim So-hye's suspicion of School violence, said in an online community on the 28th, "I was sued for defamation by disseminating false facts after writing the disclosure at the beginning of the year. I did not agree eventually, but I was decided to dismiss the police. "

In addition, the police also released the reason for the dispatch. According to the report, "Kim So-hye claims that the articles written by the suspect (A) are false, but the contents of the minutes of the 'Second School violence Measures Autonomy Committee' held at the Sookmyung Women's Middle school on May 24, 2012 show that the actual complainant was found to be an attackr of School violence, such as kneeling B in front of his friends."

Police concluded the case without charges, judging that Kim So-hye had been punished by the School violence committee and that it was difficult to say that A's claim was slanderous.

The School violence was falsely suspected. Kim So-hye agency S & P Entertainment said on February 27, "Malicious rumors claiming Kim So-hye's School violence were posted on the online site, and in February, the complaint was filed and requested an investigation. In the course of legal response, the distributor was specified, the distributor stated that he posted rumors in curiosity, and the police investigation revealed that the contents were false. The suspect who claimed the harassment was rather one of the attackers in the School violence case where Kim So-hye was Victims at the time of Middle school. The suspect wrote a malicious rumor with jealousy and submitted a statement saying that he regretted it and regretted it. "

Kim So-hye said, "I have never proposed an agreement to drop the complaint to Mr. A. Some facts have been made to decide the miscarriage, but it is true that Mr. A spread false facts. "

In sum, Mr. A and Kim So-hye's claims are not the Victims of School violence. But it is true that Kim So-hye was summoned to the School violet Commission for the School violet against Mr. B when he was a first-year student at Middle school. Kim So-hye said that he had solved the misunderstanding with Mr. B at the time, but the results of the police investigation based on the minutes were "actually proved to be an attackr and dismissed."

As a result, there is a false explanation, but Kim So-hye is still in a position to be "unjust" and the controversy is expected to continue for the time being.

Kim So-hye is set to release the movie 'Your order'