'Secret marriage divorce' Lee Jong-soo, who was in the middle of a conversation,

on
What happened today (June 25) in the past? Its worth lighting up two problematic men.Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the majority allegations.Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud.Lets review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.The court said, Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint. In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work.The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nams work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as Cho Yeong-nams work and bought pictures that were circulated.It is possible to accept the judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nams work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation.The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam.It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam.Cho Yeong-nams works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nams unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam.Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for Eagle Eye, was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz.Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintances wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society.Lee Jong-soos acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soos agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn.Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact.In the meantime, Lee Jong-soos gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days.Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far.I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people.It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, I married in 2012 and divided in 2015.It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer. He said, Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by , and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea.I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, he said. I want to live quietly as a normal person. DB, broadcast capture
What happened today (June 25) in the past? Its worth lighting up two problematic men.Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the majority allegations.Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud.Lets review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.The court said, Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint. In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work.The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nams work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as Cho Yeong-nams work and bought pictures that were circulated.It is possible to accept the judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nams work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation.The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam.It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam.Cho Yeong-nams works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nams unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam.Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for Eagle Eye, was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz.Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintances wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society.Lee Jong-soos acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soos agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn.Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact.In the meantime, Lee Jong-soos gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days.Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far.I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people.It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, I married in 2012 and divided in 2015.It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer. He said, Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by , and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea.I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, he said. I want to live quietly as a normal person. DB, broadcast capture
What happened today (June 25) in the past? Its worth lighting up two problematic men.Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the majority allegations.Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud.Lets review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.The court said, Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint. In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work.The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nams work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as Cho Yeong-nams work and bought pictures that were circulated.It is possible to accept the judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nams work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation.The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam.It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam.Cho Yeong-nams works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nams unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam.Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for Eagle Eye, was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz.Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintances wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society.Lee Jong-soos acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soos agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn.Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact.In the meantime, Lee Jong-soos gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days.Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far.I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people.It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, I married in 2012 and divided in 2015.It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer. He said, Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by , and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea.I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, he said. I want to live quietly as a normal person. DB, broadcast capture
What happened today (June 25) in the past? Its worth lighting up two problematic men.Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the majority allegations.Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud.Lets review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.The court said, Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint. In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work.The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nams work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as Cho Yeong-nams work and bought pictures that were circulated.It is possible to accept the judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nams work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation.The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam.It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam.Cho Yeong-nams works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nams unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam.Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for Eagle Eye, was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz.Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintances wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society.Lee Jong-soos acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soos agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn.Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact.In the meantime, Lee Jong-soos gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days.Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far.I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people.It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, I married in 2012 and divided in 2015.It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer. He said, Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by , and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea.I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, he said. I want to live quietly as a normal person. DB, broadcast capture
What happened today (June 25) in the past? Its worth lighting up two problematic men.Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the majority allegations.Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud.Lets review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.The court said, Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint. In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work.The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nams work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as Cho Yeong-nams work and bought pictures that were circulated.It is possible to accept the judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nams work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation.The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam.It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam.Cho Yeong-nams works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nams unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam.Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for Eagle Eye, was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz.Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintances wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society.Lee Jong-soos acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soos agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn.Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact.In the meantime, Lee Jong-soos gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days.Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far.I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people.It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, I married in 2012 and divided in 2015.It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer. He said, Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by , and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea.I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, he said. I want to live quietly as a normal person. DB, broadcast capture

What happened today (June 25) in the past? It's worth lighting up two "problematic" men. Singer and painter Cho Young-nam has been confirmed for innocence after overturning the first trial in the 'majority allegations'. Actor Lee Jong-su, whose secret marriage and divorce were both known, was known for his recent situation at the United States of America Casino while he was hiding after being accused of fraud. Let's review the issues of June 25th, N years ago, with the time machine.

On that day, singer and painter Cho Yeong-nam was cleared of suspicion of a masterpiece (modern) and confirmed his innocence; after about five years, he had completed the fraud charge.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court said it had confirmed the sentence ruled innocence in the appeal of Cho Young-nam, who was indicted on fraud charges.

The court said, "Unless there is a dispute about forgery or copyright in the transaction of art works, we must observe the principle of judicial restraint." "In the transaction of art works, whether the work was produced using a friend or an assistant can not be determined as necessary or important information for the purchasers of the work."

The court also said that those who purchased Cho Yeong-nam's work were not related to counterfeiting or copyright disputes because they were recognized as "Cho Yeong-nam's work" and bought pictures that were circulated. It is possible to accept The Judgment of the second trial that it is difficult for buyers to conclude that Cho Young-nam's work was mistaken for a friend drawn by Cho Young-nam.

Cho Young-nam was handed over to the court for receiving a certain amount of painting for a certain amount to the artist Songmo for about four years from September 2011, or receiving 21 paintings of 21 paintings that were only lightly painted on the work of Song.

The first trial court then Judgmented Cho Yeong-nam for 10 months in prison and two years in probation. The reason was that the part that only part of the painting completed by Song could not be seen as the creation of the perfect Cho Young-nam. It was also a deceit that buyers did not notify them in advance.

But in the second round, he reversed it and Judgmented the innocence to Cho Young-nam. Cho Yeong-nam's works were embodied in Cho Yeong-nam's unique idea, and Song was only a technical assistant to Cho Yeong-nam. Whether or not Cho Young-nam painted it directly with the help of others was not necessarily necessary information for buyers.

Lee Jong-soo, who is famous for 'Eagle Eye', was known for his recent arrest after being accused of fraud and making the world buzz. Lee Jong-soo is working as a host of a promotional team to respond to guests at a Casino near United States of America LA.

Lee Jong-soo was accused of fraud earlier, and he promised to watch his acquaintance's wedding society and received 850,000 won, but he was in trouble without seeing the wedding society. Lee Jong-soo's acquaintance sued Lee Jong-soo for the police, but the contact was still in a state of failure. At that time, Lee Jong-soo's agency paid the money on behalf of Lee Jong-soo, who was in hiding, and then the complaint was withdrawn. Lee Jong-su reportedly left for United States of America just before the lawsuit.

Although the case seemed to be over due to the mediation of the agency, the victim who lent 30 million won to Lee Jong-soo but was fraudulent without receiving it appeared again, and Lee Jong-soo continued to stay out of contact. In the meantime, Lee Jong-soo's gambling rumors have been raised, and the wave of the incident has become even bigger.

Meanwhile, Lee Jong-su sent an e-mail to his agency at the United States of America LA and opened his mouth in eight days. Lee Jong-soo claimed that he had given interest of 2.3 percent per month to the person who lent him 30 million won, and that he had reimbursed 13 million won so far. "I am currently in reimbursement and I will pay you back. I want to die. I am sorry for many people. It seems to be at the crossroads of choice now. I have been grateful for it. "

Lee Jong-soo, who had not heard much from him since then, obtained a full video of his interview with Lee Jong-soo at the Korean news channel USKN in May of the following year and released it alone.

At the time of the broadcast, Lee Jong-soo explained the controversy over various debts and said, "I married in 2012 and divided in 2015. “It is true that I kept my marriage secret because I was an entertainer.” He said, “Does my ex-wife (Lee) have to come out and explain the suspicion that it is not a disguised marriage?” “Do I have to keep people around me hurting me?”

In addition, Lee Jong-soo was surprised by "", and no one was interested in me when I was active in Korea. I have never had a big impact on the public or a lot of attention, "he said." I want to live quietly as a normal person. "

DB, broadcast capture