"Running Man statutory sanctions"...Above side "Sexual harassment concerns and lower willingness to improve" (official position)

on
Above said Running Man was voted on as a court sanction.The Korea Communications Standards Commission (Above) held a meeting at the Mokdong Broadcasting Center in Seoul on the 12th, decided to decide on the legal sanctions on SBS Running Man Part 2, which broadcasts the contents that could justify sexual harassment of the performers, and to present them to the plenary session.In Running Man, which aired on August 26, Lee Kwang-soo climbed to the iron bar and stripped Kim Jong-guks pants and revealed his underwear.The production team was sent out by mosaicing, tiger painting, and subtitles were I do that difficult again and (the front seat of the bar is unexpected.In addition, Noh Sa-yeon said, I did not see it, I can not do it.Even if it was an incident that occurred while playing a game in the entertainment program, we broadcast the behavior that is likely to be sexual hazard without filtering, Above said. Even though the broadcaster pointed out the problem in its own deliberation, we did not take appropriate measures such as editing, and the program repeatedly violated the deliberation regulations, so we are less willing to improve it.

Above said Running Man was voted on as a court sanction.

The Korea Communications Standards Commission (Above) held a meeting at the Mokdong Broadcasting Center in Seoul on the 12th, decided to decide on the legal sanctions on SBS Running Man Part 2', which broadcasts the contents that could justify Sexual harassment of the performers, and to present them to the plenary session.

In Running Man, which aired on August 26, Lee Kwang-soo climbed to the iron bar and stripped Kim Jong-guk's pants and revealed his underwear.

The production team was sent out by mosaicing, tiger painting, and subtitles were 'I do that difficult again' and ' (the front seat of the bar is unexpected'. In addition, Noh Sa-yeon said, "I did not see it, I can not do it."

“Even if it was an incident that occurred while playing a game in the entertainment program, we broadcast the behavior that is likely to be sexual hazard without filtering,” Above said. “Even though the broadcaster pointed out the problem in its own deliberation, we did not take appropriate measures such as editing, and the program repeatedly violated the deliberation regulations, so we are less willing to improve it.”